this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
268 points (93.8% liked)

News

33628 readers
1727 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip -3 points 6 days ago (10 children)

The answer is NO, it's not. However, to be completely fair, I've bookmarked the "supporting materials" to give it a review later when I have a little more time.

As someone who grew up in a family actually straggling the poverty line, there's simply 0% chance that any family anywhere in this country is living in poverty with that kind of income. It's well above what most households are bringing in, and while there may be a limited subset of circumstances where that money isn't sufficient, that's not what poverty is.

And I read through some of the comments in this thread -- Assuming they've come from real humans not pushing an agenda, it makes me ashamed to be associated with those people.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

and while there may be a limited subset of circumstances where that money isn’t sufficient, that’s not what poverty is.

bingo. where i live everyone thinks they are in 'poverty' because they can't afford luxuries like expensive cars, expensive vacations, and luxury housing. they are not anywhere near true poverty. but since most grew up wealthy/middle class, they think they are.

as someone who grew up lower-class, it blows my mind how poor most people are with money, and how they blame society rather than their own budgeting skills. i know people who make 40K a year who spend 10K a year traveling, and then cry poor.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 104 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Rent is like 50% of my income currently and I'm trapped because nowhere charges less for the same space and I don't qualify for rentals without a guarantor that I no longer have. At this age, my parents were in their 3rd house on a single income with 3 kids.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (4 children)

"a family of four needs $136,500 a year"

I could see that, more likely in more expensive areas. You aren't getting anywhere in New York or San Francisco on $140K.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I mean, we're poor but we make less than half that just outside San Francisco. Honestly we're doing okay. We don't get any of the luxuries my parents had at our age, but we have smartphones so we can never get away from anything!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

in New York or San Francisco on $140K.

A month?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 week ago

Like always, how far your money goes depends on multiple factors. 140k in the Midwest alone means you're living comfortably. Like all bills paid off, a lot of extra money for leisure, etc.

If you have a family and live in the bay area, then it's not that much. I personally wouldn't put it at poverty, but it'd be somewhat close to being paycheck to paycheck (assuming you still need to pay mortgage and whatnot)

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That doesn't even buy a single politician.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I live alone in a moderately low cost of living area making about 52k take home. With no extenuating expenses related to health I can put away a hundred or two a month after rent, gas, utilities, food and car maintenance (I drive and fix old shit myself rather than make a car payment). But that is literally all I can do. If I had a second person to support or was in any other area I'd be underwater quick.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

yeah but is your income going to go up? or are you like 50 and it's maxxed out?

context is everything. if you're 25 and your salary will double in 5-10 years your situation isn't bad.

blows my mind in my city how many 22-25 year olds scream how poor they are when they are just starting out their lives and think their 50-60K wage is 'poverty' when it will be 100K in 5 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. The people saying no are no longer temporarily embarrassed millionaires but temporarily embarrassed middle class. Have or have not, and 140k is have not given inflation, healthcare, education, food, rent/mortgage, energy etc.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

140K is more 85% of the USA population.

It's upper middle class. it's about 5 grand a month in disposable income. assuming a 1/3 tax rate and 3K in rent/mortage

it's also what I make, and yeah i have that much disposable income per month.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

uh huh, thank you vice and mr wallstreet substack poster for spreading such awareness, but where does that leave people in actual poverty?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›