this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1123 points (99.4% liked)

News

31448 readers
3585 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herrwoland@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Sorry the cameras malfunctioned and 4 of the guards destroyed the documents then committed suicide. Nothing is to be done here."

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something something Panama Papers...

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Panama Papers weren't swept under a rug, you just didn't follow news on them.

https://www.icij.org/investigations/panama-papers/five-years-later-panama-papers-still-having-a-big-impact/

Also Epstein 100% killed himself, and unsealing this info won't tell you anything meaningful, because predators who hide among the rich don't fucking tell every person they meet that they're a predator.

Conspiracy theories are never a good look on anyone.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not real big on conspiracy theories.

The video being lost around the original attempt is rather suspect, but him finding something to hang himself with again... He should have been in a paper gown in a padded room. We have tons and tons of suicidal people in asylums and jail that are not given an opportunity to hang themselves.

Someone as high profile as him and with a cell mate?

I'm not saying he 100% didn't kill himself, but It sure as hell looks like somebody went through a lot of trouble to provide him opportunity.

The hidden people on the list that makes this list so inconsequential are the same exact people with the type of reach it would need to make sure he didn't start naming names.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

He doesn't need to name names, because they have his computers, documents, etc. This conspiracy theory is as full of holes as QAnon shit.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, no need to answer anything I point out just put your hands over your ears and tell me I'm QANON and full of shit that'll really make your point and help your position here.

Come to think of it maybe there's a reason you're getting all the down votes...

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I also responded to your "points"

The downvotes are just "rich people bad" shit, same as ever.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And yet your take here has nothing to do with the reality of Epstein's crimes nor his suicide. It has nothing to do with the actual suicides passed off as conspiracies.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Unsealed BUT with copious amounts of black marker used on the list to cover up names.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (12 children)

What a dumb move. All the names? The judge must know that people will not be smart enough to realize being on the list doesn't mean you're guilty of any crime. And it's going to include victims? And people who might have just been included in an email?

I'm all for going after any criminals, but the problem with the outcome of this is that people are stupid and will think that inclusion on the list is the same as guilt. If we are also talking about people who fought successfully to have their names protected, it's the rich people with means who won't end up being made public.

If people were generally rational, this would be a good thing. But we're not, and it seems that all sense is thrown out the window when it comes to Epstein.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›