this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8311 readers
1487 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/44806589

...

The controversy began as soon as Beijing bought the site from real estate groups for £255 million (€292 million), after the then foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, approved the site's diplomatic use. Setting up an embassy at Royal Mint Court, the Conservative official wrote in a letter to his counterpart, Wang Yi, "will be bold expressions of the strength of UK-China bilateral relations," referring to the UK's parallel plan to renovate its embassy in Beijing.

"The Sunday Times revealed that Boris Johnson had entrusted Edward Lister, his right-hand man when he was mayor of London [2008-2016], with the task of negotiating the transfer on behalf of the Foreign Office, even though Mr. Lister had previously worked for the company chosen by Beijing to identify the embassy site," said Luke de Pulford, a human rights advocate, founder of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) and one of the main opponents of the mega-embassy.

As is standard procedure, Beijing submitted its development plans to the relevant local authority: the Tower Hamlets borough council. But in 2022 ... the council unanimously rejected the project, citing its impact on the residents of about one hundred homes adjacent to the Royal Mint. "The council was concerned about risks to their safety and the traffic congestion that could be caused by demonstrations in front of the embassy," explained Conservative councilor Peter Golds. "It was a humiliation for Beijing, as the mega-embassy had become a major issue in the bilateral relationship," said de Pulford.

The project appeared to be dead. All the more so as the so-called "Golden Era" between the UK and China has come to an end. The Golden Era was launched by then Conservative prime minister David Cameron in the early 2010s, when the UK prioritized boosting trade with the world's second-largest economy. Now, repression is rampant in Hong Kong, with China reneging on its 1997 promise to preserve the rule of law on the archipelago when London handed over this former British territory.

...

Starting in 2021, the UK offered visas to tens of thousands of Hong Kong residents fleeing repression, while successive Conservative prime ministers Liz Truss (2022) and Rishi Sunak (2022-2024) took a harder line against Beijing. Key figures in the Conservative Party (Tom Tugendhat, Iain Duncan Smith, Nusrat Ghani) were banned from entering China due to their criticism of the treatment of Uyghurs.

...

Opponents have raised the alarm. In addition to the objections of Royal Mint residents, they put forward geopolitical arguments: "We could never imagine during the height of the Cold War that Margaret Thatcher would have allowed the Soviet Union to build the biggest embassy in Europe in London. It's a completely mad idea. My argument would be that China poses a much more acute threat than the Soviet Union ever did," said de Pulford.

Another issue is the size. "The bigger the building, the greater the risks of interference and influence operations," noted the activist, who pointed out the proximity of Royal Mint Court to the telecommunications cables connecting the City to Canary Wharf, the other major financial center in London.

...

Hong Kong dissidents who have taken refuge in the UK also fear increased extraterritorial repression. "There have been a lot of examples before, where China used diplomatic premises to harass citizens or force people to travel back to China to face trials," said Lau. The young woman from Hong Kong is being hunted by authorities on the peninsula, who offered one million Hong Kong dollars (€109,088) to anyone who helped facilitate her arrest. "When I first arrived here, I felt safe. Not anymore: My neighbors received anonymous letters offering them money in exchange for information about me. When I go out, I am constantly looking over my shoulder," she said.

Hong Kong dissidents who sought refuge in the UK still remember the incident in Manchester in October 2022, when, during a peaceful protest outside the Chinese consulate, members of the consulate dragged a demonstrator into the compound and beat him. The crowd managed to rescue the young Hongkonger. The Manchester consul general and five diplomats were recalled by Beijing a few weeks later, before British police had the opportunity to question them. Lau also expressed concern about the many rooms planned for the basement of the mega-embassy. "We have proof that these rooms exist. Beijing refused to specify what they are for," said Golds.

...

Announcing a green light [for China's 'mega'-embassy] could in any case trigger unrest even within the ranks of the Labour Party, following a series of warnings about the UK's vulnerability to Chinese espionage. In November, the domestic intelligence service (MI5) warned about recruiters attempting, via LinkedIn, to contact lawmakers at Westminster on behalf of the Chinese Ministry of State Security.

Downing Street has still not provided a clear explanation for why the espionage trial of former parliamentary aide Christopher Cash and academic Christopher Berry was canceled in September. At the time, the director of public prosecutions said that he had not received sufficient assurances from the government that China constituted a "threat to the national security of the UK" to be able to proceed with prosecuting the two men.

...

The decision regarding the embassy "has become a flashpoint for the wider debate over how the UK should approach potential national security risks from China," noted the Chatham House think tank in a report dated December 3. However, British authorities' responses to Chinese espionage "appear to be largely reactive, driven by scandal and media scrutiny rather than sustained strategic planning," the authors of the report warned.

Archive link

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here