this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
29 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I recalled reading about this at the beginning of this month, I haven't seen any updates on a fix or anything. Figured I'd ponder it with you folks over here.

I have since stopped using most of my Bluetooth devices as a precaution. How real of a threat is this vulnerability? Thanks and sorry if this kind of post is in the wrong spot.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Well, since I've not seen any updates to the BT stack, I'd go with yes.

Stopping using BT seems a bit extreme. What's your risk?

I only use BT for listening to music/podcasts. I never allow BT connections to have access to contacts, messages, etc. So the only risk (contacts/messages) is pretty well mitigated (for me). For someone who uses BT for contact sync, messages, calls, etc, there may be greater risk.

And IIRC, BLUFFS is a MITM risk (existing connection can be spoofed because of how a key is managed), so only connect to devices you control, don't allow random connections, leave BT off as much as is reasonable, and perhaps delete/recreate connections occasionally (I think the key gets regenerated on a new connection?).

The most someone would get from my BT is listening to my podcasts.

[–] Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for responding, I don't necessarily have any risk, but just didn't want to open myself up to anything since I didn't quite understand what information could be taken. Better safe than sorry approach you know?

But good to know that in being selective in permissions can mitigate some issues. I worry about a few family members who are not tech literate at all and use rail travel for work that puts them around people in masse and frivolously give permissions to their devices in different vehicles.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Yea, "frivolous" is the part that's concerning. Perfect description of how average users approach tech. I'll be borrowing that!

Guess I need to write up something for family and friends, a good summary of BT risks and how to manage it. Sigh.