When you finally realise that neutrality and ethics aren't identical.
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
9604 readers
650 users here now
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Nah.. they realized, that nobody is buying their military stuff because of restrictions.
They never were neutral. Austria never was neutral. This is just a diplomatic term but ultimately doesn't mean what it implies.
Switzerland is always happy to launder and store money for any despot or pariah state. That is not neutral.
Austria's companies made (and still make) good money with Russian oligarchs. Anything but neutral.
It's a made up concept to have some sort of argument for the newspapers and common ground between diplomatic talks.
That has nothing to do with ethics. It's simply economical, and the economics of arms sales to European countries have fundamentally changed with the revival of Russian imperialism and the Ukraine conflict.
Apart from countries with imperial ambitions, countries typically arm themselves for defensive purposes in order to ideally deter possible attackers from attacking in the first place. Pretty much any country with a potentially aggressive neighbour was facing the same problem laid bare by the Swiss refusal to sell weapons to countries supporting Ukraine after the Russian invasion: The moment you are involved in a conflict, even if you're just defending yourself, Switzerland won't sell you any of the stuff they were happily selling to you before.
So why even buy weapons whose supplier will refuse to sell you any more in case you actually have to use them? Isn't it better to buy them someplace else, where you have a good chance of the supply not drying up the moment someone invades you? I guess the Swiss arms manufacturers (of which there are plenty) did notice a sudden reluctance of their regular customers to buy, and went to the government to complain.
Especially with all of Europe rearming in the face of being abandoned by their former ally across the Atlantic, that's just a business opportunity too big to ignore.
Ethics and economics aren't magically unrelated.
A late realization.
Parliament has decided to automatically grant arms exports and re-exports for 25 countries
Does this include Ukraine? Cannot find a country list.
Swiss Parliament (German source)
"Another point of criticism raised by opponents is that even with the reform, it would still be prohibited to supply weapons to Ukraine. If, for example, Germany wanted to purchase war material from Switzerland in the future and it was already clear that this material would subsequently be delivered to Ukraine or another country at war at that time, the Federal Council would have to intervene."
Only source I found quickly, and from 2025-12-04, so I'm not sure how up to date it really is.
If it is still true, it means this whole manoeuvre wouldn't fix the problem other countries have with the current Swiss regulations.
These other countries got wary because they couldn't give their weapons to a country in need due to Swiss regulations - and this would remain the case. So it's eyewash.
SRF Explainer in German (Video)
Swissmem (Verband der Schweizer Maschinen-, Elektro- und Metallindustrie, German)
Basically export to everyone except Ukraine. The Re-export regulation will be removed, with the federal council retaining a Veto ... which they probably will only use when its about Ukraine.
An argument from the counter campaign is, that if they had wanted to help Ukraine, like they claimed at the beginning of the revision, they could have just changed small details.
Especially lifting restrictions for the US, Hungary and Argentina but not Ukraine is insane to me.
It looks like a list of countries that are so comfortably safe, secure and stable (well.. maybe not the US) that they won't have a need for weapons anytime soon anyway. Excluding the Baltics for example only strengthens this suspicion.
The Swiss arms industry drastically shrunk while the world scrambles for arms. This strikes me as a PR move to stem the bleeding while changing nothing of substance.