this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
30 points (96.9% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

13990 readers
216 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
02-05 SFA 1x05 "Series Acclimation Mil"
02-12 SFA 1x06 "Come, Let's Away"
02-19 SFA 1x07 TBA
02-26 SFA 1x08 TBA
03-05 SFA 1x09 TBA

In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bgainor@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I love 90s Trek as much as anyone, but does anyone in the 32nd century ever stop and wonder why so much of the history anyone ever cares about occurred in the relatively short (and ancient by then) timespans of 2256–2293 and 2364–2379?

[–] bgainor@thelemmy.club 7 points 2 days ago

Like, the "Wall of Heroes" or whatever it's called really shouldn't be 90% people we've heard of before.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You don't think the mysterious disappearance of a war hero who was also entangled with non-linear, godlike beings would be interesting?

[–] bgainor@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course I do, and I love DS9 so I'm excited for this, but also, I'm sure lots of other interesting stuff also happened in the intervening 800 years.

At least we'll always have Turner.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 8 points 2 days ago

Please don't fuck this up

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Set memberberries to kill.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ds9 would be completely insignificant that far in the future

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

Earth has been known to keep Starbase 1 around for centuries and that space station has nowhere near the historic significance as Deep Space 9 did for Bajor.

I doubt it would have been kept as the space station serving the Bajoran wormhole, but I could see it kept in the system preserved as a historic ship.

That is of it didn't blow up due to the Burn.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You’re talking about the sacred home of The Emissary of The Prophets. I wouldn’t be shocked if they kept the place around just so Bajorans could go there to pray for his return.

It's only sitting next to a portal to the other side of the galaxy that also happens to be the home of a species that exists outside of linear time - nothing significant there!

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It depends on if the station survived that long bring operational and if it survived the Burn.

I doubt that DS9 would be the main station serving the Bajoran wormhole even if it was preserved.

DS9 ran on fusion power, so in theory there wouldn't have been any dilithium in use (though the same couldn't necessarily be said for docked or orbiting ships).

But I tend to think the station itself should be gone by now, unless they decided to preserve it for historical reasons or something.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Past the JemHadar Commandant, and Nog's name on the wall, you mean?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That Nog is listed as a lieutenant...

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which is the rank he held at the end of DS9, I believe.

I would like to think he made captain, but we didn't see it.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is that promotions were given to other characters off screen, including Admiral Harry Kim.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A consideration, certainly. It might be because the actor passed?

Nog made Captain in STO. It's not all cannon, but I like some of it better than actual cannon.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 17 hours ago

Nog has been more highly regardrd outside of the wall than on it. He was considered to be capable as a captain both in STO and even in DS9 when they had some future episodes.

I'm just noting the goddamn wall.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh hell no. My heart isn’t ready.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

That's good because you know Avery Brooks had no part in anything Star Trek. If your heart was ready it would definitely be disappointed.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Let me guess: the protagonist would be an until now unknown but close Sisko relative that behaves very much unlike a career Starfleet officer.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

or a "big bad" at the end of a season, turns out to be a very poorly thought out plot.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 0 points 2 days ago

Sisko shoots everyone dead out of embarrassment.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why is the trailer cut off and vertical, is this new Star Trek narrowing the vast expanse of space into a few inches?

They seem to be tailoring the SFS previews for the social media crowd, with no "standard" formatting.

I suppose you could argue it's targeting a specific audience, but...it's weird.

Now this is what I'm talkin bout willis