this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13006 readers
24 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] noughtnaut@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago

I want to make an art installation where a trajectoid rolls down a squiggly and very narrow board (as opposed to a broad surface as shown in the video), so it's evident that its quirky shape is particularly appropriate to that exact board.

[–] wrath-sedan@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sisyphus is going to be pissed.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know, this might actually add some entertainment value.

[–] crow@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Algorithm, that’s a buzz word I want to hear more than just “AI”. Algorithms are peak efficiency.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

isn't current 'ai' basically just 'algorithmic intelligence'?

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s certainly algorithmic but I wouldn’t call it intelligence.

[–] loops@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe like veneer intelligence.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Classical algorithms are used to make a system that can learn, and then the system learns to do things in ways we can't actually understand, to date. So, it's built on top.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can find one. A classical algorithm that generates photorealistic images does not currently exist.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, you got me, yes that counts as written. Let me revise that to "fully automatic classical algorithm that generates photorealistic images". Blender requires a lot of human input to work that well.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

This is a very cool math application but at the same time you figure this out the first time you roll a cone block down a ramp as a kid (compared to a cylinder block), so these headlines seemingly surprised about scientists discovering these things always seem like "well duh, of course"