this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
190 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
2945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
190
Electric Cars Are Already Upending America | After years of promise, a massive shift is under way (www.theatlantic.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Electric Cars Are Already Upending America | After years of promise, a massive shift is under way::After years of promise, a massive shift is under way.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In the EV age, cars are no longer just cars. They are computers.

oh no

Stripping out a gas engine, transmission, and 100-plus moving parts turns a vehicle into something more digital than analog—sort of like how typing on an iPhone keyboard is different than on my clackety old Samsung flip phone.

stop

“It’s the software that is really the heart of an EV,” DeGraff said—it runs the motors, calculates how many miles are left on a charge, optimizes the brakes, and much more.

stop, please

Just like with other gadgets that bug you about software updates, all of this firmware can be updated over Wi-Fi while a car charges overnight.

noooooooooooooooo

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 89 points 2 years ago (2 children)

“It’s the software that is really the heart of an EV,” DeGraff said—it runs the motors, calculates how many miles are left on a charge, optimizes the brakes, and much more.

Its all the worst parts of owning an EV.

Seriously, give me a mostly-dumb EV and I'm happy as a clam. The best parts of an EV are not the software (those are some of the worst).

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But you can’t. You need something to properly modulate the brake bias. You need something to translate the throttle to the motor. You need something to control the abs, stability control, etc.

Then, for cost savings, you need 1-2 simple screens to display information.

Bespoke retro/analog EVs will exist but they won’t be cheap because size they won’t sell well.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

because size they won't sell well

Looks like a typo, so I'm not exactly sure what you're saying, but I'm going to guess you're implying that the public prefers smart devices to less smart devices.

I don't know if that's true, but my understanding is that smart devices tend to sell better because they're discounted and have better hardware features, because companies want to make money on selling your data (viewing habits, installed apps, etc). But I would have to dig deeper to look for evidence.

You need something... brake... throttle... abs, stability control, etc

And all of that is fine, and that's what many cars do today. That's not really what I or anyone else annoyed at.

Here's what I don't like:

  • cryptographically paired, essential components (e.g. iPhone and MacBook do this a lot to prevent third party repair)
  • infotainment systems that can't be replaced/bypassed because they also control core functionality
  • lack of diagnostic information - OBDII port isn't required on EVs because they have no emissions
  • tracking by manufacturer - if you can access your car remotely, the manufacturer can and will

Any of that should be opt-in, not a core part of the car. I don't want to be locked into an ecosystem, limited in my ability to maintain and repair something I own, tracked, or forced to use their janky software. I want a vehicle that gets me from a to b, and the manufacturer shouldn't know where a or b are, nor should they dictate what else I can do with the car.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think we just haven’t seen the EVs hit the point where they are plentiful enough to be viable as 2nd hand vehicles that need innovative repairs.

It won’t be too long before we see current EVs stripped of their components and patched back together. Ford and others already offer their motors and control systems for purchase separately, so we know those components don’t require phone-home connectivity. It’s just a matter of piecing the parts together either homebrew or retrofitted to existing chassis that have been stripped and reassembled.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

It'll take a lot of re-engineering to make a Tesla repairable...

Some EVs are more repairable than others though, so hopefully there are enough so people who want to maintain them like term (i.e. me) can do so. If I can manually service everything except the battery pack without specialized tools or knowledge, I'm a happy camper.

[–] nayminlwin@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

A lot of "smart" devices are better off dumb.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It kind of annoys me when people say that expanded infotainment and self driving tech is an EV thing. It’s not.

LOTS of internal combustion cars are basically a rolling Android computer with OTA firmware updates. It’s been this way for quite a while now.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I can't wait to not own my car anymore and have all features preinstalled but not working because I didn't pay enough.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Audi and BMW are doing this for a decade. A friend has an Audi and he cracked the infotainment to have all the smart drive things and sensors for parking

[–] Cannibal_MoshpitV3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yo ho ho a new sea to sail under the jolly roger yaharr

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I never thought people would be rogering their cars. XD

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

An optimist I see

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wonder what they would do if found out. Would they brick the car remotely? Then would it be covered under insurance since the car is totaled if the CPU is bricked. That sure would be an interesting lawsuit to find out about the true ownership of a car.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

It's an old model, doesn't have an antenna.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is trend is happening regardless of whether or not the wheels spin because of batteries or little explosions.

We need to push for consumer protection for all vehicles.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Yup, but it's easier to lock down an EV because they don't need to include an OBDII port (no emissions), so there's really no standards they need to adhere to. So they just remove pretty much all choice at the start so people don't get mad later when they remove features in future models.

ICE cars need to do it more slowly to properly boil the frog.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Also my car updating overnight and the update broke my brakes and I am dead the next day.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

How is this a transition, though?

I had a 1981 four-cylinder Ford Ranger that needed it's onboard computer replaced so the damn thing would stop shuddering while idling. The thing had a damn carburetor, this was prior to fuel injection. Still had a small "computer" inside of it.

Computers have been in vehicles and managing parts of vehicles for forty fucking years or more.

The real transition is deciding that the electronic sensors are cheaper than physical sensors, despite physical sensors (often) being more accurate and less prone to failure.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And even further back than that, the B-29 used computers for the remote controlled defensive guns that would provide bullet drop compensation for the gunner.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Exactly. My Volvo S60 is internal combustion and is basically a rolling computer.

Shit, yesterday some software crashed and caused the power steering to go out while I was driving. That was fun.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Having computers isn't the problem, having remotely controlled computer with cryptographically paired components and limited user-accessible diagnostics is. If they can effectively control the software, they can force you into a subscription to access basic features and require you to visit their dealers to get service.

[–] wantd2B1ofthestrokes@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Transition in the same way it is for all software these days. The difference is the expectation of always on connections, constant telemetry, and continuous delivery of updates. That’s quite a bit different than the software model used for your 1981 Ranger. Though it’s not specific to cars.

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like the technology but I don't like the plans for implementation

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

That's my stance as well. All of that sounds good to me, but it being a series of black boxes that I'm not legally allowed to fix or maintain is a nightmare to me. Worse them seen as a SaaS product because they hamstring us making subscriptions practically mandatory and worse allow for enshitfication in future.