this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)

Science

15742 readers
47 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was originally made aware of this article by a 404 Media newsletter. It's pretty interesting, largely confirms what has already been known so far, but also gives some fresh knowledge, like how nutrients from insects might not be quite as available, even if they technically have a very similar macronutrient profile to meats. That's because the present chitin reduces the bioavailability to a certain degree.

CONCLUSION Edible insects represent a promising complementary protein source capable of contributing to the growing global demand for sustainable and nutritionally adequate foods. They provide high-quality protein and relevant amounts of macronutrients and micronutrients, often comparable to or exceeding those of conventional animal-derived foods, while offering clear environ- mental advantages. Nevertheless, their integration into human diets requires a cautious and evidence-based approach. Current limitations include substantial variability related to insect species, developmental stage, rearing substrate and processing methods, as well as methodological heterogeneity in the assessment of pro- tein content, digestibility and bioavailability. Inconsistencies in analytical approaches, particularly regarding digestibility proto- cols and the handling of chitin-derived nitrogen, hamper compa- rability across studies and may bias protein-quality indices such as PDCAAS and DIAAS. Moreover, most evidence supporting biological activities (e.g., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cyto- toxic effects) is derived from in vitro and animal models, while human data remain limited to small, short-term studies and are insufficient to substantiate health or clinical claims. Food safety concerns, including allergenic cross-reactivity, microbial contami- nation and chemical residues, together with regulatory heteroge- neity and persistent barriers to consumer acceptance, further constrain large-scale application. To support responsible uptake, regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders should prioritize the harmonization of guidelines for rearing substrates, hygienic production, analytical methods and labeling, including clear allergen disclosure. The implementation of robust quality- management systems (good manufacturing practices (GMPs)/ HACCPs), validated processing protocols and transparent com- munication regarding origin, processing and safety is essential to build consumer trust and enable the sustainable incorporation of insect-based ingredients into food systems.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I own two insect cookbooks, which is not a lot, but it is odd that I bought two.

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's odd indeed. Have you tried the recipes and are there any bangers in it?

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Just a couple, it turned out not to be something I am not comfortable with. For the one you take meal worms and feed them oranges and strawberries and then fry them up for crunchy fruity snacks. Nothing wrong with then taste, just the mouth feel.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't understand why people are so invested into this. We are already growing an infinite amount of plant protein. We do not need "supplementary" protein sources from eating insects. Farming insects is never going to be easier than farming soy or peas or whatever.

I swear this is some shared fetish of bad sci-fi authors that somehow made it into the collective consciousness.

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

For me it's interesting because I literally studied food tech and I like to learn about new applications of stuff. It's also interesting to me because there will always be people who don't want to reduce their meat consumption (I guess I'm in that camp too, although one visit to relatives shows me how I already eat way less meat than them), so if you can reduce the harm of the meat industry a little bit by adding insects to a product and it either isn't even noticable or actively tastes better, that's a win in my book. Establishing insect farms could also, in theory, be very cheap and wouldn't require (much, if any) additional feed to be produced since they could just very cheaply (or maybe even at a profit) buy organic waste from recycling companies and food producers to use as their feed for the maggots.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Insect farming would still be way worse than plants, though. If you're interested in it as a hobby I can get that, but to actually make the world a better place, these efforts would be far better invested in plant-based options.

There are already so many meat alternatives, if you want to reduce your meat consumption it's super easy to do, and you don't need to wait for any new products or technology to do that.

[–] RiQuY@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess it is the same reason as why people still eat meat, they want flavors, even if they nutrients consumed are worse or involves animal murder.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But even flavor isn't an argument, because a vegan diet typically involves way more flavors. I think the strongest reason is that people who still eat meat don't want to change long established normative structures of power. Within those structures, eating meat often is a status symbol, a symbol of masculinity and allows people to feel like they have power over someone else (the animals they eat). That's probably why the global north hasn't really adopted insect consumption yet, because it doesn't fit in any of the existing structures. It's a curiosity at best.

[–] Toneswirly@beehaw.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Very few plants have saturated fats, which has its own impact on flavor and texture of foods. I'm not saying anything about the morality of it, but meat and dairy absolutely are unique in the culinary world. Unless you want everything you eat to taste like coconut...

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago

No, for me and my wife it's literally about the flavour/taste only. We often eat vegetarian or sometimes fully vegan meals, too. It's just that we also do like to have the taste of meat sometimes. Yes, some meat-alternatives are relatively close, but not quite, especially when the alternative tries to mimic anything that's not ground meat. I will be the biggest adopter of lab-grown meat if it ever makes it to a commercial scale.

Maybe there are those who, as you imply, get off on the hurt of animals, but I can't imagine those are in the vast minority. With some people being so removed from food production they don't even realise that the steak in the fridge used to be a living cow that was killed for them, I'm relatively certain that almost nobody thinks "Aww yeah, I'm showing these ruminants!" when they put the steak on the stove.

[–] redfish@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 22 hours ago

>allows people to feel like they have power over someone else (the animals they eat)

I doubt it..a lot of folks don't even think about the particular animal while eating. 

[–] Trudge@piefed.social 5 points 23 hours ago

I think you spend too much time online.

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

It reads exactly like the kind of work that goes into growing plant crops, which is good. It's the sort of study that needs to be done if something is going to be considered for a possible major food source.

[–] electrotabby@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

If the nutrients are not as available, that should point to processing for extracting proteins and such rather than eating the insects directly. Like they do with some fungi for creating meat replacements. I think lab-grown meat and protein-rich plants make more sense, but anything that can feed people with less land use is a step forward.