this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
52 points (89.4% liked)

politics

28707 readers
3252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The risks for President Trump from the assault on Iran are escalating as casualties mount, oil prices rise and the war expands across the region.

Six American service members were killed, and U.S. military jets were shot out of the sky. Investors are bracing for market turmoil, fearing prolonged disruption to oil supplies. President Trump says the military campaign against Iran could extend for weeks, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that “the hardest hits are yet to come from the U.S. military.”

With his decision Friday to authorize war against Iran, Mr. Trump is taking the biggest gamble of his presidency, risking the lives of American troops, more deaths and instability in the world’s most volatile region, and his own political standing.

Mr. Trump, facing declining approval ratings and staring down the possibility that Republicans will lose control of Congress in the midterms, plunged the United States into what is shaping up to be its most expansive military conflict since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

MBFC
Archive

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He seems to have pretty fucking good odds gambling with his presidency. How is this gamble any different than ignoring the constitution, attempting a coup in 2020 or working openly to rig elections? Fuck the news. These complicit, limp wristed, public sentiment manipulators.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Surely a modicum of responsibility can be attached to the US public more broadly and not just public sentiment manipulators.

As someone who has lived in the US for several years (before Trump), the impression I get is that Trump is more of a symptom and not the cause.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Realistically the general population endure so much misinformation, manipulation, lies and deceit that i find it hard to not blame the people who produce it for how their victims behave. They'll tell you a narrative over decades about some bullshit to get you to say, vote Democrat, and don't really care what else that disinformation campaign does to people. Bunch of vicious, selfish and cruel pieces of shit manipulating us like we're just things. Or the GOP which has intentionally made red states dumber, less educated and easier to manipulate for themselves to get elected, but it also made them easier for others, like Putin and Trump, to manipulate. They don't give a shit about how much suffering their strategy has caused their voters or America.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

That's a fair evaluation, but it removes agency from the American populace.

From my time in the US, I got the impression the roots of the current oligarchic regime mostly lie in the cultural attitudes of the American population. It's not like the US got invaded by an external force or it had to deal with extraordinary circumstances.

Just one example, is the superficial attitude to things like "freedom of speech" or "free markets". IMO, that is the real source of oligarchic/criminal power in the US.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's perfectly fair to debate the degree of responsibility individuals have. However, there is a limit to the effective resistance and wisdom each individual is capable of when constantly bombarded by propaganda all day every day. Its in our schools, our media and entertainment, the news, the marketing campaigns of corporations shoving ads in our face everywhere we go, in the political messaging, even academics and science is used to propogate falsehoods and distortions. It is not reasonable in my view to expect an individual, especially in the education and science hostile red states, to be capable of navigating the labyrinth of propaganda and deceit to find truth. We are shaped and molded by our cultural environment from birth and just being capable of acknowledging your own culture is maybe bullshit is a significant feat.

We are not built to resist the intensity, frequency or repetition of the messages we are bombarded with. These groups are also pouring billions into finding more sophisticated and effective ways to shape our beliefs and behaviors. We are, from beith, under siege from a relentless attempt to make us behave one ways that benefit others and not ourselves.

I don't know how much is whose responsibility but the individual isn't the one who is creating the situation that necessitates the question. So primarily it's the fault of those manipulating that population for creating the situation in the first place. Their goal is control. The more effective they are at that, the more responsibility they have.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

American who packed up and left here.

You're not wrong. The good and the evil are probably about equal, but the apathetic/nihilists/accelerationists/centrists, who are equally as abhorrent as the evil, make up a full other third.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

In not sure there is anything he could do save for shitting himself on live tv… wait I’m getting word that yes he has done that already…. So no there isn’t really anything he could do to jeopardize his presidency.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago

"Gambles his presidency?" My god the nyt is such trash.

We're in an era of rising authoritarianism, with an illegitimate regime that refuses to obey the law, is openly committed to voter suppresion, openly engages in corruption including with foreign nationals, runs concentration camps and is lead by a known child rapist.

And yet the nyt talks like the political rules of 2006 still apply.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago

Sanewashin’ times…

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

In <insert today's attrocities>, Trump gambles his presidency.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's very much like that 'Aqua Teen Hunger Force ' where MasterShake is so stupid at gambling, he's betting on games that have already finished.

That.Fucking.Stupid.

Edit: also, all these assholes are getting inside info and winning money on these "prediction markets". Scams all the way down.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Gambles his presidency? Is this going to get in the way of his third term? /s

[–] outofthisworld@lemmy.org 4 points 1 day ago

No he isn’t. He cannot be removed and isn’t going to leave until he is dead.