The terms on the right to use user data in section 4.1 are also a bit surprising. I'd expect that from a social network like Facebook, but not from a text editor.
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
58 points (98.3% liked)
Linux
63475 readers
1034 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Never understood a terms of service existing if the project code license is GPL or such. Can't this just be forked and cured of anti features, if people value it enough to do so?
Binding arbitration (aka, if we break the law you can't sue us) aught to be illegal in every country.
Note that Zed has an Affero GPL, which limits others from competing with Zed Industries in the service space.
The zed-industries Github repository lists Zed licenses as AGPL, Apache and GPLv3.
The AGPL refers to the GNU Affero General Public license, which does not limit others from competing. Unless you mean the fact that forks must share source code when accessed over a network?
I mistakenly thought it was more restrictive, thanks.
Doesn't the AGPL just say that you can't keep your changes/improvements private? (honest question: I seem to recall so, but I'm not really sure)
It seems you’re right. I may be confusing it with another license.
It is intended for software designed to be run over a network, adding a provision requiring that the corresponding source code of modified versions of the software be prominently offered to all users who interact with the software over a network.
Thanks for checking and reporting back! (I was too lazy to do that)
this seems to only apply to their hosted services and not the binary itself?