My AI questions:
Can AI fuck off?
Can the bubble pop?
Can we make all AI models free and open source since it's entirely trained on stolen content?
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
-27 points (20.0% liked)
Technology
82461 readers
4386 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I came here to state that 90% of answers to any AI questions people may have would be a simple "no". Seems I lowballed it.
I'd love to say "yes", but my uneducated guess would that's not happening before 2027.
I'll save you a click. that article asks 3 basic questions : is it dangerous, how to tell something is AI and is it bad for the environment.
They get only non-answers. Thanks, BBC.
The answers are more like "yes", "check the source and intent", "yes"
The second one is not really a way to check if it's AI, only if it may be deceiving you, and the third one's conclusion is not "yes" but "use responsibly", like it's in the power of the common person to even choose to use AI and like corporations aren't the ones pushing it with no regard to impact anyway.
The problem is those 3 questions are very vague and would need complex answers, and maybe the guy vould have been able to give these, but in any case they're not in the article.
The third one is as close to "yes" as his weasely words will allow. I read it as a yes, anyway