this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

Astronomy

4017 readers
34 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Xariphon@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Would it be a yes-or-no thing, or more of a continuum?

At stellar mass x there's Some quark soup but it's mostly ordinary neutronium, at 50x there's More, at 10,000x there's Pretty Much All Of It, etc?

Or is it a critical mass kind of thing where at stellar mass x there's No Soup For You and at x+3 it's a veritable soup buffet?

[โ€“] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

The latter, I suspect. That's certainly how forming a neutron star works in the first place, because if a star gets so dense that it can form neutronium then the neutronium (which is far more dense than the core was before) can easily keep making more.

It's a similar story with black holes. Get past the threshold at which it forms, and the process runs away and swallows the whole star.

If a quark soup is more dense than neutronium, then it would be fairly all-or-nothing