this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
192 points (99.5% liked)

Canada

11770 readers
627 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AndriiZvorygin@helpos.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Sounds interesting. I am planning similar thing in Owen Sound with mills and cold store rooms etc. So we can localize the food supply chain.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Toronto's problem is zoning laws that prevent competition, just look at the cost of commercial real estate, no smaller grocer is going to survive renting commercial real estate.

Grocers make very low profits on their goods, but own a lot of real estate that pumps their margins up and creates an oligopoly; McDonalds works similarly as a franchise, they also own and lease the land.

If real estate prices dont rise then food prices need to rise to maintain profit margins. Which probably explains much of the food inflation, we are finally seeing the true economy when interest rates arent perpetually going lower.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why is Alberta outbuilding cities like Toronto then if its solved?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

It wasn't the issue.

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

As long as when they buy fruit and veg from the farmers that they don't reject over 40% of it because it doesn't look aesthetically pleasing, they'll be able to keep the prices down and the farmers will get a better return

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just subsidize ~~coops~~ co-ops!

Edit: I meant cooperatives. Not chicken coops. LoL!

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where I’m from there’s city laws, building codes, health inspections, and HOA’s that all make having chicken coop’s impossible/illegal. It makes me so angry. Chickens would eat all the bugs, man… and we have bark scorpions to worry about.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

My friend. While I understand and agree with you, I was talking about co-ops. Cooperatives.

But yeah I feel the same way. 

[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think they're talking about co-ops but valid, we need more chicken coops too

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

🤞

City council is expected to consider the motion at its next meeting on March 25th. If approved, the pilot program would move forward with plans for four locations across the city, though exactly where those stores could go hasn’t been decided yet.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Cue the lobbyists petitioning Ford to get involved to stop it...

my fingers are crossed for you Toronto.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is a first tiny step towards the citizens owning their means of production. Now pass some protection laws so we can keep the greedy unions out and keep the costs fairly low.

[–] hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You seriously think high grocery costs are due to unions? How are you both pro-communism and anti-union?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Unions have become big business. There is no confusion.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Its an interesting question, obviously a union would raise prices of goods. Which prevents poor people working in things like nail salons from affording food as easily, as the unionized grocer becomes a highly coveted position which gatekeeps food from the people that cant get hired there due to demand.

[–] hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In an idyllic world where no capitalist greed is focused on maximizing shareholder value that might be a more significant concern. But in modern day, a union raising their wages by 10% might result in less than a 1% increase in user prices. Whereas the ruling class of capitalists are the true source of greedflation making products unaffordable.

If anything in your example I would argue that the better solution is actually more unions. Those nail salon workers should also earn living wages to afford the goods, which unions would fight for. I would be shocked to learn of any case where a union could be compared to the average elite-class capitalist in terms of greed.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

greedflation making products unaffordable.

What makes you think its greed more than something like this:

https://tradingeconomics.com/canada/money-supply-m2

What I think happened is during Covid the BoC bought all the covid debt the federal government issued via QE, ignoring their inflation mandate; then when we had a labor shortage from inflation the Federal government did mass immigration to depress salaries. Usually the labor pressure leads to wage pressure, but we tamped it down by tripling population growth. If you see the phillips curve you can see how labor and inflation are correlated.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Playing with numbers while the stark reality of societal decay dances all around you. I can't blame you for being an idealist though. Being an idealist gives you standards to shoot for, and that is beneficial.