Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5229 readers

511 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

Yellow school buses are going green with a $1 billion investment | US EPA funding will allow school districts to purchase electric and low-emission buses (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

On Monday, the [Biden] administration announced nearly $1 billion for school districts to replace diesel buses with cleaner versions, including electric buses. The grants are aimed at protecting kids from harmful air pollution while curbing the greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the planet.

The money comes from the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law, which authorized a total of $5 billion for cleaner school buses. The Environmental Protection Agency will dole out grants that will allow more than 280 school districts serving more than 7 million stu

Ok the EPA is the one distributing it, not funding it.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So like $.34 per US citizen, not bad.

339,996,563 (2023 US pop estimate ) / (US$ 1 billion) = ~$0.34

[–] jadero@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that all government spending should be described in per capita terms. Even better would be per taxpayer. And maybe split between individual taxpayers and businesses that takes into account actual tax paid, not just the technicality of filing.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the kind of thing we unfortunately will never see because then politicians couldn't fear-monger their base into voting against their best interests anymore. It would also make it MUCH harder for the GOP to give billionaires more tax breaks if they had to put the math in the bill to show their work.

[–] jadero@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Everything starts with a dream! :)

[–] kevin_alt2@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I agree with your conclusion but I think you have your numerator and denominator swapped.

$1,000,000,000 / 339,996,563 citizens = ~$2.94 / citizen

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 10 months ago

Yep, thanks! Was doing it in a rush on mobile, but yeah, basically same conclusion. And it's out of money the government already took from everybody so it's not like everyone has to dig in the couch to find $3, they already gave it to the IRS ages ago.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Congress funded it, like everything else the federal government does.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The title could be read that it was EPA's decision. But it was Congress's decision.