What Your Bank Really Does With Your Money | Climate Town
Get away from Big Banks for all sorts of reasons, including who they lend money to. Look to the local credit unions, where YOU are a shareholder.
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL)
unknown
Football (CFL)
unknown
Baseball
unknown
Basketball
unknown
Soccer
unknown
💻 Universities
💵 Finance / Shopping
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social and Culture
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:
What Your Bank Really Does With Your Money | Climate Town
Get away from Big Banks for all sorts of reasons, including who they lend money to. Look to the local credit unions, where YOU are a shareholder.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
What Your Bank Really Does With Your Money | Climate Town
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Canada's big five banks are potentially misleading investors with their use of terms like sustainable finance, according to a complaint to securities regulators by a climate advocacy group.
Banks are using the term "sustainable finance" too broadly and not backing up the claims with data, Investors for Paris Compliance said in its submission Tuesday to the Ontario Securities Commission and the Autorité des marchés financiers of Quebec.
Canadian banks, including RBC, TD, BMO, CIBC and Scotiabank, have all made pledges on sustainable finance that together total $2 trillion by 2030.
The financing can be anything from green bonds funding a specific renewable energy project to loans that go to general corporate use but are tied to sustainability-linked performance targets.
The commitments form a key part of their sustainability efforts, but banks are providing little to back up their effectiveness, said Matt Price, executive director of Investors for Paris Compliance.
Price said there should be a higher bar for what's considered sustainable financing, and that companies working to expand oil and gas production shouldn't qualify.
The original article contains 504 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!