Meta:
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
228 points (99.6% liked)
Technology
7032 readers
452 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
quite literally the worst and most sociopathic invention possible
Name Tag, as revealed in February by The New York Times, would work through the artificial intelligence assistant built into Meta's smart glasses, allowing wearers to pull up information about people in their field of view. Engineers have reportedly been weighing two versions of the feature: one that would only identify people the wearer is already connected to on a Meta platform, and a broader version that could recognize anyone with a public account on a Meta service such as Instagram.
Creeps will instantly use it to go to where women are and find their accounts.
Not to mention any woman that has to work a customer facing job.
This would suck for men too tho, it would suck for everyone.
But it might be what it finally takes to get the dumb masses off Meta platforms. There's so many other reasons anyways, but idiots just can't delete their Instas
Fuckers played WatchDogs and thought what a great idea.
In the first case the device would still have to identify people not connected to the wearer to determine if they are connected or not. That seems like it would make it much easier to bypass and tag strangers anyway.
This sort of item should be illegal.
I saw some fucking idiot with these on at a show a few months ago and I had to exert a lot of control not to yank them off her face and stomp on them.
Nobody wants to be recorded secretly. Especially not at a show. That’s a gross invasion of privacy - and, in fact, illegal in some jurisdictions (two-party consent laws for recordings).
Less control next time please, dunno how old you are but that's exactly the human immune response that rid us of Google Glass. Early beta testers consistently got rocked whenever they wore them outside and the project went nowhere. I'm too old now and don't get out enough but pray the kids are up to rejecting round 2
I'm already that dick who calls everyone out if they're recording or taking pictures on their phone during the show, so I am definitely comfortable calling out these jerks.
That's Meta's whole intention with these.
...in pursuit of what?
Data?
Wouldn't be surprised if there are some Palantir x Meta smart glasses in the pipeline.
Pre-order now and get one free year of Flock Together—the only personal security service that combines cutting-edge facial recognition technology with Persona integration to provide real-time risk assessments of your fellow countrymen based on their ~~social~~ credit score, public records, and data broker profile.
More than 70 civil liberties, domestic violence, reproductive rights, LGBTQ+, labor, and immigrant advocacy organizations are demanding that Meta abandon plans to deploy face recognition on its Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses, warning that the feature—reportedly known inside the company as “Name Tag”—would hand stalkers, abusers, and federal agents the ability to silently identify strangers in public... In the May 2025 memo from Meta’s Reality Labs that the Times obtained, Meta reportedly wrote that it would launch “during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.”
The main issue isn’t even the technology itself, it’s that it’s Meta and owned by the Zuck.
I’m sure there are ways to engineer this so the data stays on device and use it for specific scientific purposes exclusively.
There is absolutely.
You'll never appease the shareholders or maintain your ~~quarterly~~ growth that way... ^Trump is pushing to eliminate quarterly reports for public companies, so they may not need to care and can just be evil for the sake of it.^
It's funny how they enshittify it for consumers first, but now aiming spread enshitification to wall street so they can fuck those 401ks even harder.
Capitalism baby!
The main issue isn’t even the technology itself, it’s that it’s Meta and owned by the Zuck.
There are a thousand corporations tripping over themselves to out-horrify the public.
I’m sure there are ways to engineer this so the data stays on device and use it for specific scientific purposes exclusively.
I'm sure there are but if you see one in public, how would you know? Best just to ban them all.
zuck is meta.
Love that my 
co-workers wear theirs to work. Like, we're doing already barely constitutional monitoring and entrapment of the online left, why are you documenting our work to third party vendors, bro?
If I ever see anyone with them and they look in my direction they will be turned into monicals.
Sounds like you need to talk to your local government officials about having them banned in your area, otherwise you are going to spend a lot of time in jail/prison. Glasses didn't take off when Google did them because the tech wasn't there yet 10 years ago. Meta is launching theirs now, Apple will be launching multiple next year, which means Google may be launching them again depending on the success Apple and Meta see.
As far as laws go in the U.S. It is generally accepted that if you leave your property, you can be recorded. Hence Ring doorbells, cameras in and outside every store, on the street lights, etc. I don't care for it, but privacy (in public) doesn't exist anymore.
them because the tech wasn't there yet 10 years ago.
That's not true. They didn't take off because they boiled the frog too fast. They were rejected by polite society. That society is gone.
Palatable effort, fellow keyboard warrior!
I really wanted to read harm not arm.
Well yeah look who made them
Hell, they probably consider that a plus.
What? They didn’t learn this the first time? Yes the glasses are a cool idea but we need to be more responsible.
I don't even get why anyone thinks they are cool. They don't even have displays in them. I would understand for smart glasses with no cameras, but the ability to display a HUD with navigation, music info, text messages, etc.
If it makes money then nothing else counts. Go american capitalism! /s
just like the og google glasses it ended used for PORN.
That's capitalism: they have to please their shareholders.