this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
51 points (94.7% liked)

Gaming

4746 readers
148 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (3 children)

$30 a month. I stopped paying that. That's like 4 games a year in subscription fees. I'd rather just buy 4 games. I don't need endless games for that price.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are there even 4 90$ games worth purchasing in any given year?

Most of my library is in the <30$ range

[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Good point. I just bought Fallout 3, New Vegas, and FO4 for under $16 total.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Even with the $60 price tag for each these three are half of what they are asking for a year.

[–] eli@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I dumped it when it went from $5 to $10 a month for PC gamepass.

$120 a year gets me A LOT of games on Steam sales.

I know I'm not the target audience, but it was pretty nice playing tons of games for $5 a month.

At $30 I don't think I could even justify that. It's absurd. Even as a one off to play everything I could...I'd rather use that $30 for literally anything else.

[–] FaygoRedPop@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, and the games keep getting worse and worse. It's like phone app quality games called "King's Realm 3" or some shit that no one asked for.

[–] amaryllisfever@lemmychan.org 3 points 5 days ago

That's insane. It really shows how little they think of the customers that are naive enough to pay it, especially seeing as it's clearly not necessary to charge that much.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The solution, obviously, is AI.

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Somehow it's always AI. Just like it was blockchain before that. And "the cloud" before that.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You say "the cloud" like that isn't the exact business model of gamepass. Instead of buying it once for a slightly higher up front cost, they've convinced people to just rent it and have been raising prices ever since.

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

Maybe not so much that one admittedly.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Keep in mind when she says that, that Microsoft is probably not looking to lower the price of GamePass, but to find other things to include in that price. I sincerely doubt they're going to lower the price and just leave the cash on the table - they're going to add something to the subscription to keep the people already paying $30/mo from dropping. To make it feel more worth their while.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Has there ever been a major subscription service that decreased in price for an equal service?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 5 days ago

From just the headline, I would have thought it was too expensive for Microsoft, and the price would be raised. Someone seems to have a head that isn't firmly lodged in their asshole over there, tho.