this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
47 points (94.3% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
408 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tarsn@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How does it compare to water running through plastic pex pipes in your house?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Never mind the plastic pipes in your home, there's nothing filtering the water from the treatment plant to your tap. Literally kilometres worth of pipes that haven't been cleaned in years or decades that your tap water is running through.

Not to mention that municipal water in Canada can be tainted with high levels of lead..

Bottled water may have "plastic particles", but some brands put their bottled water through reverse osmosis filtering, so it's way cleaner than your tap water.

And I am NOT advocating for drinking plastic bottled water, simply pointing out that tap water isn't really "clean" once it reaches your home. I filter all the water I consume.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

Bring back copper pipes.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I probably get chunks of rusted steel in my water...

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wouldnt be so quick to blame all of this on water bottles when a high percentage of all the food we consume is packaged in plastic and also the left overs sitting in the fridge.

[–] person@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What do those have to do with microplastics found in bottled water?

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am commenting on this section of the article:

"We and others have shown that these nanoplastics can be internalized into cells and we know that nanoplastics carry all kinds of chemical additives that could cause cell stress, DNA damage and change metabolism or cell function."

Somarelli said his own, yet-to-be-published work has found more than 100 "known cancer-causing chemicals in these plastics."

And also

What's disturbing, said University of Toronto evolutionary biologist Zoie Diana, is that "small particles can appear in different organs and may cross membranes that they aren't meant to cross, such as the blood-brain barrier."

My point being that it's unlikely that bottled water is the only source of these plastics.

[–] person@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Neither of the quotes you supplied make that claim.

[–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] person@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I do not have a point that needs sourcing. The article quite simply does not discuss other sources of microplastics. It does not dismiss them either.

edit: Allow me to elaborate a little less formally. OP's initial comment straight up sounds like whatabaoutism by Big Bottled Water. It dismisses the microplastics in water bottles, pointing to other sources of microplastics. OP then claims that the article dismisses other sources, failing to provide any relevant quotes. Have I gone insane?

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc -3 points 10 months ago

Or you could just buy food from the produce section without plastic...

[–] Numpty@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Drink bottle water and consume plastic particles... drink tap water and get all the other contaminants (places I travel for work outside of Canada have highly contaminated and unsafe water... so water with bits of plastic are the lesser evil).