this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
75 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

14518 readers
632 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

One step closer to roleplay servers that would actually get me to pick this game back up.

It's a great solution and the only people that are mad are griefers. It's turns out PvPers want to have battles between multiple people that have PVP setups willing to fight and PVE players want no part of that. PvP players can KOS anyone and it be considered fair, so they don't have to be afraid of ruining a peaceful player's farming. And people who want to play both styles can ignore the PvP farming bonus, farm on PVE and then go to the PvP instance for some combat. Everyone wins, except those who relied on one sided 1v1 or 2v1 ambushes.

[–] quafeinum@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess if they had done that from the start then I could ignore Funcom for a minute.. but now that i know funcom is involved I dont want anything to do with it.

[–] Junkasaurus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

What’s wrong with Funcom?