this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
57 points (76.6% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3650 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those of you who don't want to use a ChatGPT but want a LLM.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As it's to be expected from this website, the article quality is subpar.

They mix third party hosted LLMs, with frontends (KoboldAI, GPT4ALL) and with local models (which BTW, every single one of them is a llama finetune. They've never heard of mistral or others, apparently).

If I hadn't read this website years ago and knew that the quality was already trash back then, I'd say this very article was written by a LLM.

[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Very strange article. It lists several front ends, some of which are not open source, as well as some raw models without clearly distinguishing between them. RWKV was mentioned which is cool I guess.

The first option listed should have been huggingchat, followed by the various local UIs, with a separate section discussing the models themselves.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

I feel like most of these "10 alternatives to xyz"-articles are basically a summary of alternativeto.net. Or they've just listed all projects they've found with a quick search. I'm almost certain they didn't install them most of the time.

This also applies to "comparison" sites, which usually are a list of Amazon affiliate links. At this point, I don't trust websites with affiliate links anymore, as they've never actually tried the products. Sadly those spam sites make it difficult to find actually good reasearched tests.

Back to itsfoss, they write many articles, and some are good, but they still are blog spam.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No mention of the ai horde , seriously? We have thousands of users!

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

That's dope never heard of it until now

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Pretty bad article, but here are my two cents on the actual answer, as of right now:

  • General chatting: OpenHermes
  • General querying, instruction: Mistral
  • Coding: Deepseek-coder

These perform similar to or better than ChatGPT 3.5, in some cases comparable to 4.

For specific niche applications (role playing, nsfw stories, etc), just search on huggingface.co and read the user reviews.

[–] Papanca@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's a bad list.

YSK: There are several things mixed in it.

  1. There are "models" (usually meaning "weights" specifically). The models (weights) are the raw data that contain the wisdom of the AIs.
  2. There is software to "run" these models on your own machine, or to connect to an API.
  3. There are services which run models for you and let you interact via web interface, app, or API. Some services may add text to your prompt, to create a better(?) prompt.

There is a bewildering array of models out there. Mostly, they are specialized and/or merged versions of some popular foundation models (by mistral, meta, and a few others). Without endorsing any service, I find that openrouter.ai and together.ai let you try a fairly large selection. There are other services.

You can find more/better information here: !localllama@sh.itjust.works

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Also want to mention privateGPT

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've been using iask.ai or Phind.com for mostly quick answers to my simple questions, these get me by but I'm no coder or author and I have noticed these options are often pretty terrible for math queries.

Edit: the above services I'm pretty sure are not open source, but their privacy policies seem reasonable.