That's because Europe is soo terribly slow with allowing these robo cars. They are so much better than humans. Humans suck at driving. Once when we have all the robo cars here, you will see the numbers finally going up again!
/s
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
11036 readers
1296 users here now
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not really, you can watch video about it on youtube channel "not just bikes", he makes great points about why this is bad idea and why best way to reduce fatality and car crashes is to just make better alternatives to cars such as bus network or trams (street cars) or bike lanes or anything really
So where in my little text did you stop reading? ๐
Gotta go to eye doctor I guess lol ๐ญ
Well this is marginally better than the reporting we usually see on anything that involves numbers, in that they mention that there is an ongoing declining trend and they give just enough context that we can be pretty sure this year's number is fully consistent with that trend. Of course they do not actually tell us the variance, they do still pretend that one year's number is more significant than it is in reality (e.g. "second year in a row with a decline") and we have no idea how cherry-picked that 2014 date for comparison might or might not be. But still, not bad Europe. A time series chart would've been a very easy way to improve it.
If you actually cared enough to actually read the article, you would have found the link to the longer version. and also some datasets in it. But it is obvious that you just want to complain. Otherwise you would have clicked those links and actually found the data you claim to be looking for.
Yes, I saw the links to more data. I cared precisely enough to read the article, and not enough to follow those links to discover the real story on my own. I sometimes take a moment to point out the obvious flaws in pieces such as this one due to a vain hope that someone responsible for reporting on things involving numbers will one day see such complaints and be inspired to do better.
Whining on Lemmy is about as effective as writing your complaints on a piece of paper and storing them under your bed.
Have you considered sending feedback either to the reporter or the paper that the reporter works for?
Some people do indeed write on paper in a journal and keep it under the bed. Some scrawl their words in pencil on the bathroom walls. Some write letters to their members of parliament. Some type stuff into the handy text box on Lemmy. To each their own, I guess.
I was referring to this:
I sometimes take a moment to point out the obvious flaws in pieces such as this one due to a vain hope that someone responsible for reporting on things involving numbers will one day see such complaints and be inspired to do better.
If you are going to complain about it, why not send the complaint to the people who are writing this stuff? You already wrote the comment, copy paste that to the feedback box. That way theres a 1% chance that someone reads it and learns from it. Just writing on Lemmy theres a 0.00001% chance for that.
But like you said, to each their own, I guess. If screaming to the void makes you feel better, go for it.
Screaming, huh? It seems an odd interpretation. To me it still looks only like a casual observation, of the kind one might be expected to make in a discussion thread about a news article on the Internet. It did not seem out of place or even all that remarkable. I did not feel moved to attempt the kind of more in-depth consideration and analysis that would justify the effort of directing a message specifically to the official statistics agency of Europe about it.
Anyway, to the extent that the message about being careful in interpreting statistics is important and needs to be heard, readers need to hear it as much as reporters.
Obviously I didn't mean literally screaming, you just said that you hoped that someone responsible would notice, I only commented that maybe that same effort would be better directed straight into the eyeballs of the people who are doing this.
You are of course free to write your criticism anywhere and in any way you choose.
Nice to see decreasing numbers, I thinks it's because of many reasons but mainly investment in public transportation and passager trains as well as decreasing population. Article doesn't really talk bout what cars had bigger fatality rates but If u have to guess it was probably big American cars (forgot the name)