Thanks for sharing the article! I don't know whether it's possible to edit the title, but if it is, consider changing each use of "e.g." (exempli gratia) to "i.e." (id est) or "read:" (expression meaning the message that you believe should be read from between the lines) as I believe these changes might better communicate your intent. Thanks for adding the clarifying commentary to the headline though, it's certainly more eye-catching and to the point than the publishers un-annotated version!
(This whole comment is assuming that these are your additions and not simply an earlier version of the headline. The version I saw through the link didn't have them so I assumed they're yours but they could've been removed by the publisher for the same reasons I suggested editing your title - if possible and you agree with my suggestions)


