this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
121 points (97.6% liked)

News

23275 readers
3433 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This would be so great, not just for people with legal prescriptions, but also for employers. I was close with people in HR in my last job were afraid of being sued either way. They are in legally unprecedented areas. Let someone who uses a legal and illegal drug work? Or refuse them work for their Rx.

Reminds me of “don’t ask, don’t tell”

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I guarantee employers will still drug test and fire you even if it's legal. Because most states allow them to fire you for whatever they feel like as long as it doesn't violate the Civil Rights Act.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Some might try, but it’d probably get litigated. You can’t really get fired if you have a legal prescription (legal recreational use would be different, but the DEA has suggested schedule III status, not recreational legalization). The HR people I know are mostly concerned about their liability (using machinery while high, driving, interacting with customers, etc.)

[–] Pyro@pawb.social -1 points 10 months ago

Still slippery even legal. It can stay in the system for a bit so someone working "high" is a factor

It would solve so many problems though just have it legal and controled

[–] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

They have for a long time. I seem to remember the DEA commissioning studies that they would later have to get approval to officially ignore because they didn't like the outcome, multiple times. They would use highly reputable research centers and then drag their names through the mud. War on drugs is a profit and power generator.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

but nothing will done except to make sure cannabis businesses and corporate interests stay protected

our current leader flip flopped on this issue firing staffers who had use cannabis and going back on campaign promises

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1519/use-national-commission-address-policing-issues/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1529/decriminalize-marijuana/

decriminalization means the states decide what to do like Florida

places like Florida make money off the whole thing by taxing a software company there that makes the cannabis compliant software for all legal states, by the taxes/ fees generated from medical cannabis in Florida, and from the free labor/ fees and such from it being illegal recreationally by locking up recreational users and parole fees and what have you

biden chose a prosecutor who made a career out of making cannabis users the enemy in California for a vice president what did people expect when voting for him

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

What is happening in your post?

I don't think anyone was under the impression corporations wouldn't benefit from legalizing marijuana. Legalizing marijuana under any president was never going to create luxury space communism on its own.

Yes, we know taxes will be taxes and exists and legalizing marijuana will create more of them.

What are you talking about software companies for?

If you don't like Biden. That's fair. Your feelings are valid. But just say that instead of this feaver dream of a post.

I don't like Trump but I I have no problem saying his administration did some things well. If Trump legalized marijuana, I would praise him for that.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

genuine question: why does this have to take so long? we all know it's going to be months as the gears grind towards the inevitable conclusion. why can't they just do the politics, run a hurry up offense, get it done

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

My guess: they are making sure their corporate buddies have the logistics and support in place to corner the market and price out small businesses owners.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Problem is they will reschedule it and bye bye legal industry. All of it will be in the hands of the feds. Fuck that