this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
82 points (97.7% liked)

politics

29907 readers
2145 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greenlandic officials worry about the direction of the negotiations aimed at defusing President Trump’s threats to seize their island. But they have little leverage.

Trump still wants lebensraum

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The United States has pushed the talks beyond military matters and wants effective veto power over any major investment deals in Greenland to box out competitors like Russia and China. Greenlanders and Danes strongly object to this.

That's the free market's "competition" in actual practice. Extol the virtues of competition and the free market, while undermining it wherever possible.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

The free market is an illusion. But it's a good one, and it fools most people.

Once people in the west really start suffering we won't see enough people pushing back against obvious corruption. Russia is just getting there barely and look at everything that's happened there.

America is just barely getting started

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

Trump was in real estate. He wants land. Greenland does have leverage. They could refuse the US offer. Greenland doesn't have the power to stop a US invasion but such an invasion would be illegal. Consequently, a subsequent administration could withdraw. However, if Greenland signs a deal, that would be legally binding.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

In another room, Greenland demands a major role in the United States of America.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

What the fuck. There are no "talks". MAGA is starting with an ending and working backwards, just like Iran.

There can't be a peace agreement with Iran because the whole point is the distraction.

There can't be any real talks/agreements with Greenland because US control of it is the goal and a sovereign nation will never accept that, ever.

It's just a long song and dance designed to let MAGA buy time to consolidate power before they just take what they want anyway.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Mexico has agreed to let him have Greenland if that's something he wants to do. And if he wants a private massage, Mexico is OK with that.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Trump can fold his demands till they are all sharp corners and jam them directly up his arse.