this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
812 points (92.7% liked)

Comic Strips

23882 readers
2201 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptTitle text: This is how you all fucking sound

[A smug tech bro wearing a sideways cap, watch, chain around his neck stands in front of a data center by a lake with dead fish. A smoke stack blows pollution into the air]

Tech bro: AI is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a suit with cigarette in hand stands in a restaurant while two disgruntled diners cough from the smoke]

Suit: Smoking indoors is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a top hat and suit stands in a factory with two sad and dirty children]

Hat: Child labor is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug plantation owner stands in front of a field with with two angry slaves]

Plantation owner: The Atlantic Slave trade is already here, there’s no going back.

Still Vreni on Bluesky

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 28 seconds ago

It's comparing apples to oranges.

AI is software. We never stopped any software change before. Even heavily disliked and banned systems like crypto currency or vpns etc. still exist.

For the record I agree that AI needs more regulation and we could even force stop development of new models but LLMs will never be stopped in any meaningful way. You can take an open source model and run it today.

LLMs are here to stay until it's replaced by other technology.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

I feel like this comic is bait

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No one who is impressed with LLMs to the point they believe they should in any way be mistaken for intelligence must be summarily ignored and excluded from decision processes which affect anyone not similarly impaired.

LLMs are only AI as Accelerators and Amplifiers of Ignorance and Incompetence, with vanishingly scarce examples of Iteration and Insight.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 1 points 17 minutes ago

LLMs might be garbage but the children yearn for the mines. And are we really better as a civilization for the loss of indoor smoking while indulging the all-you-can-eat option at Sizzler?

[–] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of when the stupid "Web 3.0" made up by blockchain freaks was supposed to be the future. Not every technology will be as widespread as the internet. The internet facilitates communication across the entire world and offers many advantages over phone, mail, and other forms of communication.

The use cases and advantages are clear, even if there was an overly eager hype cycle in the 90s. AI might have some uses, but a clear advantage has not actually been established yet, nor have the legal challenges been ironed out. Remember that the current iteration of AI would not have been possible without breaking tons of IP law, slurping up as much data as possible.

[–] auntieclokwise@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Agree AI is as overhyped as the internet in the late 90's was. I also think AI or some descendent of it will likely be as ubiquitous as the Internet is now. There's quite a few problems right now that AI just seems really well suited to solving, unlike the blockchain where it really only solved one sorta esoteric problem. I look at AI as being the bridge between the real world where things are fuzzy, rules are inconsistent, things don't have clear cut answers, etc and the digital world where everything is precise and well defined. That's not something that's going away.

However, what I see happening with AI is much the same thing as what happened with the Internet. To use the Internet in the late 90's was frustrating. The computers sucked, they were huge, they used a bunch of power, the connection was slow, connections dropped, they weren't always on, they took quite some to establish, etc. It wasn't till CPUs got good enough to be able to be battery powered and still render full websites (in other words, the key building block of a smartphone) that the Internet really became a ubiquitous thing for most people. Today's AI uses way too much power, requires hardware that's way too expensive, is less smart than people think it is, has problems learning, has problems with hallucinations, etc. What I see happening is the AI bubble crashes, like the dotcom crash, but then it comes back once the technology is really ready.

As far as law and IP go, the Internet often had lots of issues with that too. Lookup the origins of why we have Section 230. It's still something we're arguing over. We'll figure out the legal issues. And IP law is broken, has been for a long time. It needs a revamp to bring it back to some sanity. I have no problem with AI breaking IP law. Much of that shouldn't be under copyright anyway.

[–] pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 51 minutes ago

If you compare AI with crypto, or NFT ok. This meme doesn't have sense...

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No, because you guys debating with actors who exist only in your head

[–] 3rdXthecharm@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 hours ago

Why do you say that? I had this exact conversation today at work

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I am more mad about people saying "it's improvng exponentially." The rate of improvement is falling, if enything.

Bunch of people said it because sci-fi made them believe so, and then everyone else went along with it for some reason.

Either the exponent is 1/2 or people are just having shared delusions.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 30 points 5 hours ago

Except child and slave labour was cheap and profitable. AI is neither cheap nor profitable.

Apples and oranges

[–] aGenitalBreeze@lemmy.world 34 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Well to be fair to the giant pieces of shit in positions of power all over the states they are trying to bring child labor back as well

I'd bet good money it's the same people fighting to keep child marriage.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Good bet they'd like to bring smoking indoors and slavery back, too.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

Whats wrong with blowing smoke into the face of your child slave??? We used to be a country

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Most people want to bring smoking indoors back. The only people who don't are the weird shut-ins who sit around posting online all day. People out in the real world don't view having an after meal cigarette as equivalent to fucking slavery.

You guys have to remember that if you ask a random person on the street what Cthulhu is, they're not going to have a fucking clue. Everyone in this thread is a weirdo. Including me.

[–] aGenitalBreeze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm a chainsmoker and I'd prefer if they didn't.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The only people who talk positively about bringing indoor smoking back are smokers and pub owners, and they're in the minority.

Of course it's not morally equivalent to slavery, but the ban on smoking indoors made my life and a lot of people's lives much nicer, even before you factor in the reduced risk of lung cancer from secondhand smoke.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago

The only people who talk positively about bringing indoor smoking back are smokers and pub owners, and they’re in the minority.

I like my booze, but if someone wants to light up, they ought to be outside with their booze.

[–] canniest_tod@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

None of those things were new technology. The assembly line didn't go away when people were angry about being laid off.

If you're talking about a specific product of AI ("art" for example), you might want to make that clearer. If you're talking about AI in general, you're treating this one thing like it's a reason to try turning back the clock.

The rational thing to do would be getting politically involved to get AI out of corporate ownership.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›