'Helm'
Lofl
this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
109 points (99.1% liked)
politics
29928 readers
2051 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This pedophile is sllooowly losing his judges pockets. Bout time.
Fucking pedophile.
Much too slowly if you ask me...
The key strategy in Project 2025 - which was written quite explicitly, and explained in a brutally honest way by that fat hobo-looking Martin Bormann wannabe Steve Bannon with his "flood the zone" statement, is to do egregious stuff so much faster than the justice can react that, by the time it does react, it's already much too late.
If you ask me, one of the key reform that needs to take place when this bunch of second-rate fascists is out is to make justice capable of taking snap decisions, so it can react as fast as the zone-flooders.
This Kennedy Center naming thing is a totally minor issue compared to the other grave things the Trump administration has done and is still doing, it should have been a no-brainer from the get-go, and this decision should have taken place the day Trump nailed his name on the wall next to Kennedy's, not months later.
I find it odd that a new policy is given preference even if a restraining order wins, and the courts suspend any restraining orders pending the appeals. The new policy should be blocked pending appeal instead, if the policy changes a long held status quo.
What a lozer 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yeah, that's not what happened. The judge ordered Trump to have it taken down, which he'll disregard, as he has many orders before, because the judges he appointed granted him complete immunity from "official acts", or presumably the lack thereof.