this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
187 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
818 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least, some of the recent controversies.

(page 3) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cambriakilgannon@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always assumed this guy was a d-bag.

[–] HumbleFlamingo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Brought to you by our sponsor, dbrand.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Other than the Madison Reeves post I just read, I am completely out of the loop on the LTT controversy. That said, I made it about 1/3 of the way through the video before I had to stop it. I know very little about these guys but that video is infuriating.

[–] kek_w_lol@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Short and sweet summary as called out by Gamers Nexus:

  1. Testing methodology sux and results are not sanity checked, thereby misleading consumers.
  2. If errors are caught, they are corrected poorly and acknowledged with asterisks or in description, which does not put enough of a spotlight on it.
  3. Trashing on a small company (billet labs) that makes dope coolers for performing poorly due to improper testing and not retesting because "I don't wanna spend 500 bucks"
  4. Not returning the prototype which was sent to them by billet labs for testing and AUCTIONING IT OFF (allegedly to a potential competitor) at LTX.
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›