this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
187 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
609 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least, some of the recent controversies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 88 points 1 year ago

Monetizing an apology video of all things says it all.

[–] Animortis@kbin.social 77 points 1 year ago (5 children)

From the majority of the team, this is a pretty good and textbook PR mea culpa. "Here's how we screwed up, here's how we're fixing it."

The pushing the merch was tone-deaf and the defensive whining from Linus was NOT on-point, though. I appreciate it ended with "how I'm going to fix it," but he should keep the defensive shit to himself.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would be better if the CEO could learn to read a prompter so it looks like he's not reading one.

This is pretty annoying to watch with his eyes looking above the camera and going left and right constantly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 40 points 1 year ago (30 children)

Guess, I am out of the loop.

After Linus blasted people using ad-blockers (fucking hypocrite), I uh, just blocked his channel.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

@Chozo The end of the video:

But Dbrand did offer

... is basically advertisement for the brand, packed into "a joke". Why would they mention it otherwise?

[–] thecodemonk@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the video itself is monetized.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pipe01@lemmy.pipe01.net 12 points 1 year ago

They have a meme relationship with dbrand

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree that it's good they're acknowledging the problems but that video felt like an interrogation. So corporate and weird.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

I loved LMG and watched their videos for years, but if you are going to put out false or exaggerated data knowingly, or auction off a one of a kind prototype, would pass me off but I might tune in from time to time for the entertainment.

But if you are called out on this and instead of trying to do the right thing you double down and even straight up lie to try to make a case where you aren't the bad guy, then I am done with LMG channels as I can not support a company with this clown.

[–] Xamrica@lemmings.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

IMO a good answer and directly adresses my biggest stated problem of "we know stuff goes wrong, but we don't care about them" (see https://lemmings.world/comment/1218294)

The thing about Madison: if true it's very concerning, but for now it's only one person who told about these problems and I don't know her enough to trust her like that without proof. In contrast: I trust GN and they showed proof

But that doesn't mean you should ignore these accusations and I would like to see an answer from LMG.

This is MY opinion on this matter. Your opinion may vary!

[–] andrew@radiation.party 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Re: Madison, she sprinkled a bunch of non-issues (edit: I don't mean to downplay the more serious issues she raises! I'm concerned that this would leave room for others to do so) or things that are normal for companies that aren’t super huge- the journal/lined paper debacle for example. Of course the company focused on profit is going to ask you to make do with essentially the same thing. That’s super normal.

Being asked to manage the OF despite objections isn’t super bad when you are literally hired just to do social media. It’s unpleasant, but most jobs are going to have unpleasant moments. At a similar pay scale, I’ve been required to go into homes where folks had COVID. Coworkers have been shot at. I’ve seen things I really would have preferred not to. No job is perfectly sane in that sense.

Some of the issues where Madison said “they wanted me to do x and I couldn’t because y” (red footage editing/ram comes to mind) feel like issues where she would be told something, then would vent in her head instead of going “hey, I don’t have enough ram to edit that footage!” - something I’ve encountered a ton with less experienced (in a business sense, not skill) hires.

The managerial and behavioral issues she brings up are awful but not entirely surprising given the type of folk who stick around there. It indicates a systemic issue and that usually happens due to a lack of oversight and course-correction, or outright malicious management. I’m hopeful that it’s the former.

Last but not least, she repeatedly states it was her dream job. This is an experience that should hopefully show her to never meet your heroes! Dream jobs usually suck unless you get lucky, because they have lots of rough edges. Hopefully she’s doing something that brings her more joy now.

[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You can't force a woman to manage an OF account against her will, knowing VERY WELL what she'll be exposed to. That's fucked up.

[–] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Why "a woman" specifically? And how would that be against her will?

[–] eendjes@feddit.nl 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the internet is exceptionally shit against women in particular, and because she clearly stated she didn’t want to do it.

This is kinda basic stuff.

[–] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's just the manager of the account, not publicly facing on OnlyFans. She was asked to complete a task well within her job description, that is not against her will, she is against the job. A before you say looking at genitalia wasn't in the job description I urge you to look up what facebook moderation is like.

[–] eendjes@feddit.nl 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The kind interactions (including pictures and such) you get on OF vastly differs what you will get on other platforms. That’s not in the job description.

And to your last point, she was a social media manager, not a Facebook moderator. How does that compare? Are you intentionally making bad faith arguments?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] juni@skein.city 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was expressly against her will as per her own words. And as for why "a woman", its rather well known women already deal with much more sexual harassment and maltreatment online than men do. Just look at the market of AI generated porn of celebrities and online personalities as proof of this. So forcing a woman, who already has a public presence no less, to manage a platform such as OnlyFans, and constantly see and have to manage sexual objectification and harassment towards her as well as her coworkers, is unacceptable in my opinion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you seen how men act when they’re horny? Especially on the internet? She probably still gets gross DMs constantly.

They basically set her up for harassment for life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mechanize@feddit.it 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel that your post is belittling a situation that, as narrated, is straight up mobbing and bullying, only acknowledging it in a small paragraph which I feel boils down to a dismissive "awful but only maybe malicious, probably just lack of oversight", while the rest of your comment tries to find excuses and normalizing something that is not.

These:

I was asked about my sexual history, my boyfriends sexual history, "how I liked to fuck".

I was told that certain issues were "sexual tension" and I should just "take the co-worker out on a coffee date to ease it out"

I was told I was chunky, fat, ugly, stupid. I was called "retarded" I was called a "faggot"

My work was called "dogs--t" I was called "incompetent".

"I think the reason you try to be funny, is because you lack any other skills." smiled then walked away.

I watched co-workers get what I had asked for weeks before they did. It took 2 months to get mine.

Also apparently some managers didn't like me because I "hadn't gotten drunk with them before" Which was said in that haha just jokin (but actually I'm serious) tone

Are nor normal nor acceptable: for anyone who is in a corporation where this is common place: take a step back and understand that it is not healthy for you, bad power dynamics are a real thing and the abuse of them sometimes can feel normal, especially in small businesses that get a sudden explosive growth. And I don't even want to go into her self harming to get a day off.

You can say it was probably a single person, but the lack of action by management with phrases like "change your priorities", "put on your big girl pants" and stuff like that makes it a Company issue, Company which indirectly accept and endorse that kind of treatment: they being so against unionizing sincerely gets a whole other meaning read under this light.

The notebook case is self evidence of it all: A small thing that normally wouldn't be anything important, but compounded with the stressful environment got emotionally distressful. The fact that such a small thing has stayed with her so long should tell you that she was really not in an healthy mental state.

I don't personally care about the whole LTT fiasco, as an uninterested spectator it's fun to watch from the outside and then change channel, a blip in the media world that will most likely blow down in a couple of weeks. But reading how these actions are belittled is really distressing. Bullying is not normal, and it should never be accepted. Ever.

The full thread for whoever missed it: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1691693740254228741.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aebrer@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

At a similar pay scale, I’ve been required to go into homes where folks had COVID. Coworkers have been shot at. I’ve seen things I really would have preferred not to. No job is perfectly sane in that sense.

American? Because this is not normal up here in Canada.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actions speak louder than words...

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Their action was to monetize the apology video, which is especially funny after Gamers Nexus explicitely didn't monetize their video. They advertised their shop and floatplane and teased a new product. Just incredible.

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

They really cannot help themselves. Money corrupts all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago
[–] Animortis@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know Linus was pushing back REAL hard on getting a fact checker. And it would've likely prevented this situation entirely.

Edit: Other than the pushing of merch... Sigh... This is a pretty good PR mea culpa. At least from the rest of the team. I guess I should finish it. Pretty textbook. "We screwed up, here's how we're fixing it."

Edit 2: Nevermind. I got to the part with Linus. FFS.

[–] juni@skein.city 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The fact they're still hiding their testing methodologies behind floatplane makes me dubious of how effective this "housekeeping" week will be. Not that I plan on watching or interacting with anything LMG related going forward until the allegations brought up by Madison are properly handled anyway, in which then my final decision will be made.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] plistig@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do we do now?

Just shut the company down. LMG peaked years ago, and went downhill from there. And even back then it was worst amongst the big tech channels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Relax. So they made some mistakes. Cringe mistakes that could easily be avoidable (a lot like much of my life has been). Either they do better in the future or they die. People are getting so upset and enraged it looks like this is something that matters. They are still fun, I like them. Im rooting for them to improve!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Oh my god i am so tired of seeing posts about this, PLEASE can we give it a rest? i want to leave this trend hounding shit on reddit

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 year ago

It's been like 3 days dude, calm down.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] President_Pyrus@feddit.dk 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am carefully optimistic about this. They addressed the problems and seem to take some time to fix them. I hope they will focus on quality over quantity as they promised.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (7 children)

After all the shit Madison revealed, you’re going to give these creeps a chance?

The PC world truly is a toxic cesspool if you can sand behind these assholes a second longer.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›