this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
1108 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

“Global warming could challenge the very fabric of the world’s ecological and economic systems,” warned Shell executive Ged Davis in one newly uncovered document from 1989.

Could it? No shit.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“We have investigated our donors and found nothing wrong.”

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Ya, a big chuck of Dems have, but not a majority in either chamber of congress by a long shot, and even thouse still who have signed are only being pressured into refusing donations, not doing things like not relying on oil lobbyist and their former oil executives advice to keep gas prices low and manage the energy transition.

Hence why we’re still building new natural gas plants as a “bridge” technology even though we could instead be using cheaper energy sources that don’t produce massive quantities of carbon by operating.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and a lot of Big Oil companies have signed pledges to do what’s necessary to stem the tide of their damages.

That doesn’t mean squat.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Federal campaign contributions of $200 or more are public, as are a lot of the state-level campaign contributions. You can verify compliance.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Politics is already rife with illegal money pal. This is all performative.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

The people who have signed have a tendency to also actually vote for decarbonization. So not so much.

[–] JulesTheModest@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Have they (big oil leaders) no conscience???