CanadaPolitics

1883 readers

3 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 9 months ago by Pxtl@lemmy.ca to c/canadapolitics@lemmy.ca

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(note, Title copied from Global's Twitter post on the article, which more clearly explains the concern, unlike the Headline).

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

This is not good.

[–] SheerDumbLuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A smaller company ClaimSercure had been pulling this shit with Rexall. Is it time for unions to test Canada's antitrust laws?

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know unions would have standing for a lawsuit - wouldn't the lawsuit have to be filed by a competitor?

[–] SheerDumbLuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

I presume there would be an employer with unionized employees who uses Manulife as their insurance provider.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We need to pass a law preventing this now I suppose.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

How about, and I know it's gonna sound crazy, WE APPLY THE NDP'S PLAN AND QUEBEC'S EXAMPLE AND INCLUDE MEDICATION COVERAGE IN HEALTH CARE???

Fucking hell.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, I suppose we will. It's pretty sad that this kind of thing isn't already illegal.