this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
640 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

87105 readers
3944 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 0 points 4 minutes ago

"X needs to be banned" is a sign someone has no place in the conversation.

[–] subgenius@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

They shouldn’t be allowed in a work place setting withought prior acknowledgement and consent.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I can totally understand the reason to capture video and conversation during a medical consultation. As someone who has to see a dermatologist from time to time, I've had pictures taken.

The proper protocol is to get consent first, before donning the glasses or pulling out the camera.

And I bet that the perv glasses are not the best option for capturing data for medical analysis.

[–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Especially since whatever footage is shot is certainly going to meta servers.

Insane to even think this is remotely okay.

[–] grepe@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

ianal but that alone is probably a serious breach of hipaa for which the doctor should be slammed

edit: i just realised that article is not from the u. s. and a.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

I see why places moving towards a full on ban of the Pervert Glasses.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 29 points 3 hours ago

If true he should lose license.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 27 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Smart glasses are COOL! Why are you so BUTTHURT about Docturs and Social Media giants with DISTURBING and NONEXISTANT Privacy Practices seeing your PRIVATE NAKED VIDEOS? Stupid LIBTARDS!

-People in this Thread!

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

so fucking sick and tired of the pervert glasses boosters.

these things belong on people with visual difficulty, the visual description service should be free to them, and the devices restricted otherwise. it's fucking gross that so many people think 'you have no reasonable expectation to privacy in the public' == creep cameras are cool.

fyi, there are laws in most states against voyeurism - in my state that creep behavior is a felony.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

so fucking sick of the creepglass fanboys

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Lemmy unfortunately does have a chronic sexism problem.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

eh... there are sexist assholes everywhere.

I don't think it's nearly as bad as reddit was. but that's my own experience, ymmv.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I could use them to document, diy content creators would get some great close up work details ...hell even the OG google glasses are in wide use in warehouse logistics for their huds. There are use applications. But they're not advertising for that. They're advertising for abuse. And they're getting that demographic

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

do whatever you want with other consenting adults in the privacy of your home.

No one would say shit.

It's the upskirt downshirt creepshot assholes, it's the pick up artists and racist harrasment dickheads that should be beaten in the fucking street.

I feel bad for the people with vision impairment that these could genuinely help, but instead of making an accessibility tool, meta's chosen to make a privacy invasion tool that has some great accessibility uses, then try to use that as cover for the creeps.

it's all so fucking on point for the creepshow that is meta

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jafra@slrpnk.net 90 points 6 hours ago (19 children)

I am confused. Why is this even up for debate? Why are we even putting up with people trying to debate this?

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 175 points 7 hours ago (13 children)

Pervert Glasses™️ by definition can not be HIPAA compliant.

The fact that this doctor even made the attempt should warrant a serious review of their conduct.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

I used to work at a hospital and I have experience with doctors who firmly believe that their comfort and convenience tops HIPAA and anything else. I had to file several violations for doctors who wouldn’t stop using SMS instead of their pagers. Every time their excuse was “I don’t like the pager, it’s old.”There is a nonzero chance that this doctor didn’t even continue thinking about the consequences beyond “but I need to have the latest thing”.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›