this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
143 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

87337 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AverageEarthling@feddit.online 2 points 4 hours ago

I only buy books from thriftbooks. Haven't seen any slop books there yet. And there's just something about a well worn book. They are just more fun to read.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 11 points 12 hours ago

public libraries are pretty cool

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Well duh. Also real authors are flooding Amazon with crap too. Have people not been paying attention?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Before AI they offered a lot of books which were just printed wikipedia articles.

However AI books massively increases the problem, because they can be created by the thousands, millions even, in seconds by any grifter out there, and there are a lot of grifters.

Any sort of argument of "it has always been bad" (and it has), are not very constructive, because the current situation enhances the shittification of the internet on a scale that was impossible before. It is an unprecedented situation.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah it really is. So was Amazon bulk printing pulp.

Its almost like maybe amazon wasn't the place to get random books.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

AI will never become JARVIS, KITT, HAL9000, or whatever super AI you seen in media.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago

Of course not. Wasn't my point.

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

How soon until Amazon buys one of each, prints them; ships them to a different warehouse, rips the pages out and scans them back in?

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 19 points 16 hours ago

I swear this is the real reason AI companies are concerned about watermarking - not for the public good, but so they can keep their model training inputs clean.

[–] KssioAug@piefed.zip 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

If I had to guess, most of these 'books' are some kink bullshit. Ever since I looked for the rankings in the Kindle section, it was flooded by books with men or women stripping on the cover and some random erotic titles. Among them some rare exceptions (and most of these were some cheap self-help stuff).

That being said, I wouldn't be surprised this is what's being actually affected. I can't see the actual data or content of the article though, because it requires me to subscribe and I definitely won't.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Copycats might also be an issue. I remember that when Douglas Wreden published his book, he had to deal with numerous AI-generated copycats popping up one after the other, using his name and face, trying to trick people into buying their book, because his had become popular.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I get the impression that most kindle books are sold (well rented) by subscription, i.e. all you can read for a fixed monthly fee, so a subscriber downloading an AI book or other crap doesn't pay any increment to do so. IDK how the revenues are divided up.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 16 hours ago

You don’t get paid until the reader reads x amount of pages of the book.

I sell way way more than through that subscription bs. I removed my book from it. It keeps the author on Amazon.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

So these things are actually sold in recognizable numbers? smh

A philosopher has once said that you should only read books that are >100 years old.

[–] Vathsade@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

Huh, my high school teachers in the 90s were all philosophers

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Who the hell is biting them though? I wouldn't even think of buying a book by a human without prior research. Gifts maybe?

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 1 points 9 hours ago

People with metal teeth! They can bite through this, they can bite through that...

They can even bite through the main power conduit!

[–] KssioAug@piefed.zip 7 points 20 hours ago

Exactly what I wonder. I have a list of 110 (and growing) books I want to read, all of them written by human beings, and I discover something new all the time. There's no way I will buy a random book on Amazon, be it from AI or by some author I've never heard anything about.

[–] mczolly@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago

Especially since they could generate the same slop for themselves

[–] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 8 points 22 hours ago

Can’t read the article :(

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I wasn't buying books from Amazon. I'm not gonna start now. Certainly not going to start buying AI slop "books".