this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
372 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87612 readers
4359 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/70348978

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

pls post at least 1 paragraph of the article into the post body, to get a quick overview what it's about.

[–] WillieShen@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I think it can be removed, at least for my phone, in the settings > Google or just use adb.

If they really care about users' security, they should make Graphene OS's GMSCompact and explicit permissions the new standard instead of restricting what apps can they use and forcing invasive system apps. And centralized censorship and requiring an account is not what makes apps secure. Source available and reproducible build is.

[–] story@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

hey folks i got graphene, do i need to worry about this or is this what the sandbox is for?

[–] Kewlio250@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago

Google cannot install apps in Graphene without explicit, app by app permission (due to the sandboxes Google play). We are safe

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

just hoping my current phone survives ling ebough that my next one can be a linux phone

[–] mbp@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago

2027 is year of the Linux phone for sure

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Meanwhile, in 2357 AD…

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Aren’t viruses and spyware illegal?

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically it's neither. Viruses spread and spyware sends your data to an attacker. This app does neither. The third party feature however does make it easier for spyware to identify sensitive content on your phone, but then you have a problem anyway because you gave a spyware app access to all your media.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

I can see actual digital cameras are going to become popular again...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You can uninstall it and install this so that Google can't get it back on your system.

https://github.com/daboynb/Safetycore-placeholder

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what the fuck? I had no idea about this. I never opted into this.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No shit. The billionaires at the top worry about public safety, would you believe it? (giant fucking sarcasm tag goes here for all my asperger ftiends)

Who owns the (fully paid up) phone that's in my hands right now? I try to tell myself I do, but...

Yea, I am not a happy camper.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If we weren't so fucking weak and unorganized, we'd be burning their companies and their homes to the fucking ground.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Apple already uses machine vision for photo searching, that weird auto categorization it does and such. They have for years.

I would bet the photos app already classifies nudes, but silenty, mostly so it doesnt add your nudes to an auto album.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 114 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (20 children)

I can see a promising market for 'dumb' point-and-shoot digital cameras reemerging.

  • Doesn't automatically upload your pictures to train AI on, no internet-based privacy risks whatsoever

  • No AI nanny telling you that your pictures are too naughty

  • Never needs updates, can never be enshittified by new updates

  • No risk of the government getting their hands on your pictures, unless they physically confiscate the device

  • Can never be hacked without physical access to the camera

  • Doesn't listen to you or watch you or otherwise spy on you

  • Most models have easy to change user-replaceable batteries

  • Most models are compatible with SD cards for easily upgradeable storage

  • Can take advantage of a larger lens and more adjustable focus/zoom to take better pictures (Even a relatively cheap digital camera could potentially take better pictures than the ultimate flagship phones that cost 4-figures.)

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Those kinds of cameras didnt disappear.

But Canon already enshittifies their bodies some, with links to the canon.cloud subscriptions in-camera (which is a front for RAW training if you read the ToS), a subscription for linked editing software, and some feature crippling to push them.

There is actually healthy competition in the space, though.

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It has already reemerged as part of the retro trend among young people.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Instant photo cameras are pretty popular

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›