this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1102 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
2184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 190 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Literally every single day we have idiots doing Musk's PR work for free.

Downvote Musk spam. The billionaire doesn't need your help making sure his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You think being inevitably forced to see every bit of harassment and spam is going to make that platform more popular and financially viable? Nah, if anything this is free advertising for Mastodon.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 158 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

What in the actual fuck does he think is going to happen

[–] uwe@lemmy.world 184 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I have him blocked. It's my fault. He noticed and now he is going to axe the whole feature

[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I could actually seeing that being the reason he’s doing this. Nothing a narcissist hates more than people ignoring them.

[–] BrudderAaron@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is PRECISELY the reason. He fired a lead engineer who told him they can't control how many people engage with his tweets. So he made it so that EVERYONE gets to see his tweets in their feed. Queue mass blocking of him and now he's upset.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jsveiga@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He's going to be able to harass everyone that had blocked him.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet he will still be able to block users without them knowing too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 151 points 1 year ago

"it makes no sense" literally every social media site in existence has the block feature, and the reason is to help people prevent harassment. Elon is like a fucking toddler, it's obvious he just wants to get rid of blocking because he's pissy about being blocked by other people.

[–] Chenzo@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (21 children)

So... Wait.

This means someone can just @ someone else and destroy their feed with hate or dick pics or whatever?!

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like people should start setting up nasty ass porn bots and have them spam Musk constantly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 107 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The block "feature" is a required tool for being listed on the Google and Apple stores, among others.

Removing it will get Twitter delisted from them as well.

[–] Thee0023@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago (18 children)

That'd be nice if it actually applied, but Apple has already made exceptions for X among other large companies to allow them to play by different rules in the store. So I'm not holding my breath for any sort of punishment.

Examples:

  • X got a one letter App Store name that was previously against the rules (other devs need their app name to be at least 2 characters) (more info)
  • YouTube had been blocking iOS PiP background playback (not sure if they still do) and put that feature behind the YouTube Premium subscription. Background playback and PiP is part of iOS's system capabilities and the rule specifically says it's not allowed. See Apple's guidelines section 3.2.2 (ii) here. With this, one could make the argument that PiP would only support system supported video decoding, and YouTube uses DASH for higher resolution videos, but YouTube does offer video and audio streams that are natively supported by Apple as well so I don't hold much support for this argument.
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] stochasticity@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago

This is incredibly consistent with the "free speech" crowd thinking free speech entitles you to an audience.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 92 points 1 year ago
[–] PBCrisps@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Just stop using Twitter. It's easy.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Unreal. It's not even incompetence, he really is just tanking the site on purpose.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No he's not.

He's a right wing grifter and always has been. And like many on the right, he views harassment as a form of "free speech" which should be acceptable.

He's not tanking the site on purpose. He's tanking it because his bullshit ideology naturally results in creating a hostile environment that people don't want to be a part of.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The block feature is not there out of the goodness of their CEO's heart.

It is there to limit liability from harassment. After all, why police harassment laws at your expense. When you can get the end user to enforce it for you.

It's just Dumb evil.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This is so dumb, what is he thinking? What's the angle?

Dumbness aside, Twitter is only usable if you block all of the blue check spammers who add nothing to any discussion.

Maybe he's doing it so you can't block blue checks? But it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

[–] krakenx@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I half wonder if he is running an experiment to see how much his users are willing to put up with so that all the other tech companies can figure out how far they can push us.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lmao this is going to be incredible to watch unfold. I am assuming Elon himself has blocked an absolute fuckton of accounts that are just out to troll him, so either he’s gonna (rightly) get absolutely inundated by trolls, or he’s gonna make the devs disable it for everyone except him and whoever else he wants to give that feature to.

[–] notatoad@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, elon's not going to see the negative consequences of this personally, because he'll just use the "ban" button instead of the "block" button.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shashi154263@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yup. X makes no sense. Please delete it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] st33lb0ne@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I cant wait for Twitter/X to cease to exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

“Mr. Billionaire Tech Company CEO, what was your detailed reasoning for the removal of a highly important feature that benefits way more users than the ones it harms?”

“It makes no sense”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Huh, I have never been a fan of blocking people, but this is a very dumb move, normal Twitter news of course.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Blocking people is essential, I've blocked tons of people and communities on here already

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CrypticFawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have never been a fan of blocking people

Must be nice, not having to deal with being harassed by people who wish you were dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PenguBlue@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hasn't Elon blocked people before tho? And even been public when blocking some people?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 33 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, he's going to be able to keep it doing in the meantime it becomes a premium feature.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He is actually, seriously saying "I don't get it, so it must be bad/unnecessary"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this man actually retarded or is he trolling us? Seems like he's intentionally shitting on Twitter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] donuts@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago

I recommend just blocking the entirely of Xwitter. Your life will be better off.

[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (10 children)

He'll make it a premium feature

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is really attempting to run it into the ground isn't he?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such an incredibly stupid idea

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was probably the most blocked user on Twitter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re going to hear his dumb thoughts whether you want to or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sndrtj@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am so glad I ditched twitter when Musk took over. Blocking abusive people is a critical function on that cesspool of a social medium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] veloxy@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's probably having a fit over everyone blocking him from their feeds

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sab@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

This is going to get buried, but I think it's important to note that block on twitter (unlike on most platforms) works both ways. You can still mute an account, and you won't see any of their content or mentions.

By removing block, it means you can no longer block a person from following you, but you can still prevent seeing their stuff. After all - all that person has to do see your public tweets is open an incognito browser window, and view your profile. If you have a private profile, none of this applies to begin with. So in that sense, I agree with Elon - block in its current form on twitter makes no sense.

Edit: Responding directly onto your posts - good point, I hadn't considered that. It's partially circumvented by changing the setting so can comment on your posts, but I agree that's more effort. For all the other things though - if you block someone now they can just take a screenshot of your tweet and comment on that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CrypticFawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Holy shit. The block feature was the only function that actually worked when dealing with trolls and assholes.

Remove that feature, and the remaining Queer and POC communities are going to be forced off the platform due to the abuse they will not be able to block.

I suspect this is mainly because people with the Blue checks keep crying about getting blocked.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›