this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
81 points (97.6% liked)

Linux Gaming

27575 readers
118 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

Help:

Launchers/Game Library Managers:

General:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Huh. Well, I guess I didn't notice this because I use display port still.

Wild.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

So HDMI 2.1 had been blocked by the HDMI forum, despite AMD having done a lot of work to try to persuade them that it should be allowed in the open source drivers. It's not clear to me why the forum was blocking it, although a comment on Phoronix says, "Which companies are shareholders in this organization? Ah...MS. Apple, Nvidia, Broadcom etc... Hummmm !!!"

Valve is rumoured to be behind some of the recent work on AMDGPU, motivated by the Steam Machine - a different comment on Phoronix says, "When the Steam Machine benchmarks came out, showing performance inferior to the PS5, I got the impression it was limited by software rather than hardware", which sounds plausible. Getting HDMI 2.1 working on the Steam boxes is likewise probably a priority for them, as some gamers won't switch away from Windows until it's there.

It's not mentioned in the Phoronix write-up, but I presume the implication is the HDMI forum has relented and finally given their blessing to this work, rather than Valve is just YOLOing it.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 minutes ago

There's also the cleanroom theory of AMD & Valve having some devs sit in an environment without access to specs for 2.1 or anything and reverse-engineering the whole thing from scratch. Because for some stupid legal reason that'd be allowed.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Paradoxeuh@jlai.lu 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What a silly thing to fight for. This sentence was read, corrected and rewritten by three different AIs.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 minutes ago

"Using a machine, made through evil, reurgitating stolen art that threatens artists is bad!"

"Haha you're silly."

Well, you do you. Other than you DeckPacker's backbone makes them look hot, rich & sexy.

[–] FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What is? Phoronix? The kernel? These specific commits?

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 9 points 3 hours ago

is it the thumbnail that appears in Lemmy for this post? I don't see where it came from, as I can't see it on the Phoronix article though