this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
183 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

10719 readers
307 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 2 points 5 hours ago

Ah phew, thank God. Was afraid they wouldn't do this. /s

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 13 points 15 hours ago

"Wants to". They are just testing the waters for a response.

I've been telling people for years that Apple is just better at marketing. They sell this image of better security and everything, but they are just big tech with a bigger smile and make up than the others.

You trust Apple? You fell for the lies.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This just pushes me closer to Motorola and GrapheneOS when it launches in a year or so.

Fuck Apple and seriously fuck Google.

[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 11 points 16 hours ago

No need to wait, get a secondhand pixel and enjoy GrapheneOS already.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 11 points 18 hours ago

I'm shocked! Shocked!! ... Well not that shocked

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Simplest way to delete their userbase. They’re the last big Tech company that still has a semblance of respect for user privacy, if any.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 28 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No semblance, only a facade

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Semblance. Are you saying that there are literally no privacy features? Privacy is a sliding scale, don’t gatekeep some certain level of privacy as “legitimate” and call everything else below that line fake, that’s disingenuous.

Compared to Google, Microsoft, etc, they are more respecting of privacy than other big tech companies.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yes because they're sooooo transparent about how they handle you data. And they've NEVER lied before riiiiight?

It's not that they're fake for not being private enough, they're fake because of their long history of dishonesty and deceptive marketing. Or would you like to ask them what "current competing hardware" means on their next press release chart?

Apple was a cult of personality run by a snake oil salesman until jobs died. Now it's a shell of that, run by a board of investors. Why do people on communities like this, an ostensibly ant-capitalist community, still feel the need to defend them? It's always so weird to me.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 15 hours ago

They just pretend to be.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 18 hours ago

apple users will eat it up because "whoa look the ai is so much better now that it knows everything about me 😮😮😮"

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They know people lack better alternatives, since all the other tech companies are doing the same.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

They also know people don't care, because they continue patronizing those companies.

[–] HarneyToker@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Yes, I’d imagine that would remove the incentive to stay within the ecosystem.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub -3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago) (1 children)

Paywalled. Archived link. While I have no love for Apple, and have audited their privacy claims for this and other privacy communities over the years, adding an opt-in toggle to allow anonymized data sharing for improved service does not seem like a “backflip” in privacy, any more than other user feedback channels would be.

But go ahead and downvote because I didn’t just roll with your Apple bad narrative, silly munchkins

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

apple apologist

insults everyone

Yea that tracks

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Free thinker

Doesn’t care at all about the truth, only casting reality to fit his pre-existing worldview

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'd only have to explain how that opt in is predatory, to be understood, to an apple apologist like you

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub -2 points 6 hours ago

I'd only have to explain how that opt in is predatory, to be understood, to an apple apologist like you

Did you mean to compliment Apple apologists and me or did you mean something else?