this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
26 points (96.4% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3207 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That seems like a great idea.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. I’m wondering how fast of a charge it could output, and if the idiots who own the DSL/POTS copper infrastructure in the states could/would ever consider doing something similar.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 months ago

The article suggests 2x 7.4kW (230V 32A). So faster than a standard plug, as fast as a typical dedicated home charger, much slower than a DC fast charger.

That implies that a cabinet typically has a similar size power feed to a typical house (230V 63-100A in UK), or they are intending to over-subscribe the feed and dial back the chargers depending on load from the equipment and load on the other charger.

I have a feeling the NZ ones were only 32A total. This could easily vary by region and by cabinet model.

It could also depend on how much power the equipment in the cabinet draws. A cabinet where almost all the customers have been relocated to FTTH probably has a much lower power consumption than one full of customers using VDSL to stream everything, and I think the article implies that it's these less-used cabinets that could be converted.

Many are also probably to be decommissioned as copper switch-offs progress.

My understanding is that the US is somewhat behind in terms of FTTH rollout compared to NZ and the UK, and the cabinetisation occurred later, so there is probably less spare capacity.