this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
692 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

88498 readers
3816 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago

Sounds like another assault on freedom of speech.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (2 children)

political theater. won't happen because it's unenforceable.

  • VPNs operate outside of federal control
  • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor which is laughable
  • DNS exists outside of the US

if this does happen, IF, it has nothing to do with IP rights or protecting Americans. it has everything to do with censoring what the majority of common Americans read online. this is the first step towards blocking news outlets that won't regurgitate whitehouse directives.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm a bit surprised they've gone with piracy as an excuse - usually it's "Think of the children!" Maybe they've finally figured out that we already know that republicans are thinking of (molesting) the children so they've fallen back on "You wouldn't download a car".

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
  • ISPs leverage DNS blocking to censor

And blocking the IP address of the site in question, as well. That’s why so many “illegal” sites jump around IP addresses like a flea on a hot griddle. They’re trying to remain accessible whenever the ISP prevents direct access.

Because if you block the IP address, blocking DNS is superfluous and performative -- it’s just window dressing for better optics towards politicians who don’t understand tech. DNS censorship trivially bypassible by using custom DNS servers that aren’t affected by the censorship, while IP blocking hits everyone who is under that ISP regardless of their DNS settings - they need a VPN to bypass IP blocking.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

all that's going to do is give them an excuse to block IPs outside the US by the block.

keep an eye on the FCC and any legislation they take against HAM or SDR. without that it would be difficult to have any comms outside the US.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

No, IP blocking is widespread in most places, it’s just that “rights holder” lawsuits go after the domain name, first, both in terms of the registrar and DNS. They also force ISPs to block IP addresses, but this is more of a whack-a-mole prospect so it’s usually a second-order method.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And wouldn't you know it, anything that disagrees with the current regime is piracy.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not just piracy. Woke piracy.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

Woke piracy is the best piracy!!

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 18 points 6 days ago

Ban the RIAA and MPAA.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

My ISP wondering why I only ever access 5 servers in Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and Finland

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But surely the whole point of using the VPN is to use one that's outside of U.S authority?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not if you want low lacency.

IMO your main concern should be about what country the VPN is based out of (and their privacy policy) more than where the servers are located. But then again I suppose it all depends on what kind of activity you're using your VPN for.

When I was messing around with my VPN, I was looking at translated news from Germany, France and Spain and they all have more or less different data usage policies. It's interesting but at the same time, you can just go on a news website that a country mainly uses and translate it.

Interstingly though, when I used a VPN, it changes all the typical homepage shortcuts on Google chrome to what Germany, France and Spain uses for the main shortcuts.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like they want people board and mad, a historically winning combination.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Hungry soon too

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Aggressively stupid bullshit, fuck these clowns.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The Corrupt Empire of America at it again.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 10 points 6 days ago

I think they are copying what France and Germany are trying to do and make it worse.

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 12 points 6 days ago

I think i2p may see a big uptick in usage then.

[–] AntonioAndolini@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

There is a surprisingly good amount of free games and movies, it would actually save me time if they were to "ban vpns"

[–] alchemist2023@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

host your own recursive DNS like technitium or unbound then you remain in control they can't deny root DNS

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

DNS only handles the initial domain-to-IP translation.

What the article is (mostly) talking about is the second step - blocking access to the destination IP/site entirely.

load more comments
view more: next ›