Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
π Be Nice!
ποΈ Community Standards
𧬠Keep it Real
π½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due
π Post Formatting
π¬ Post Frequency/SPAM
π΄ββ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)
SΓ, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]πΏ Moderation
The following artists are banned from the community.
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/46578520
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/prompt-3
Alt text
Back when I was in art school, we believed in this with all our hearts.
Bonus panel
AI will never want to be fucked, therefore AI can never create art.
What about ace people?
I think a much more universial example would be that AI will never desire garlic bread
How about AI will never want to be loved?
The key is needing to impress people to convince them to feel a certain way about you, something that garlic bread does not capture.
People make art for themselves all the time.
Self love
Observes art from an arm's length.
Nope, I'm still a piece of shit.
Wait, what did you say?
What about porn chatbots you prompted to really want to be fucked? π€
They're faking it.
Literally
Not really. They would need to have consciousness and drives to be faking it. The models are predicting what words would have the highest likelihood of being used in response to you telling them to tell you they want to be fucked.
Also if they were capable of evolving into something thinking, they'd probably actually be the robot version of horny
Heck yeah they would
To be fair, AI managed to fuck me today with Microslop's GPU availability being rubbish. Not every GPU needs to be used for forcing copilot on random office workers ffs, some people need them for things that aren't LLMs.
Remember, AI cannot hold a copyright. That AI art you created? No you didn't, AI did and it's basically public domain.
Well, its "skill" was built on public domain or via piracy, so its result should be public domain too.
Hell, my interpretation of the "derivative works" clause of GPL stipulates that all llm and genai products should also be gpl.
Hell, my interpretation of the βderivative worksβ clause of GPL stipulates that all llm and genai products should also be gpl.
...an interpretation broad enough to cover that would also mean that anyone who has ever seen GPL code before would only ever be able to write GPL code ever again. The idea of which I imagine would give Richard Stallman an erection you could see from space,
It's different when a human does it accident than when companies build a licence laundering machine
I'm still convinced that being unable to copyright its output was always part of idea of laundering the stolen data fed in. This way it effectively self sabotages the copyrights of every company and individual using it.
So if I could convince a model to do a frame-by-frame recreation of a specific movie, maybe change a detail here or there, then I could distribute that movie without violating copyright?
I would suspect it would end in a similar manner to reverse engineering code, if you get a description of the whole film without specific products or actors, then recreate from that, then yes. But if you directly compare the scenes and make corrections to the output to make them closer, then no.
But you'll have to do it and get sued anyway so the courts can rule on it.
One of my core memories is the shy girl in my photography class at community college complementing the pictures I took of my cat.
The standard to qualify as art is very low. The standard to qualify as worth looking at is much higher.
AI can make a picture, it can't make value. I have seen some decent looking AI generated images, but there is absolutely no value to them.
Like copying a jpg and calling yourself an artist.
Art is about creating emotion. AI art does create emotions/feelings (hate, anger, nausea, etc).
So does posting a giant pile of diarrhea.
There have in fact been very successful art installations involving human waste and feces.
Or installing a urinal as an exhibit in an art museum? That one was pretty famous.
My lactose intolerance finally makes sense.
...need to impress the shy girl...
For some, sure. Creating art means many different things to many different people, but it always means something. Generated content has no meaning. It's just output.
No, no, you see AI artists do have intent to impress.
It's just that instead of impressing the girl in art class and maybe bumping genitals, they want to impress the 4chan mob and maybe get up votes.
Considering how 4chan is, a more likely outcome is that you're getting called at least 3 different slurs because someone will either hate the slop, or perceive your insecurity about being unable to do art and decide to attack you.
Power of boners.