this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
235 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

73331 readers
6210 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demesisx@programming.dev 128 points 1 year ago (3 children)

SELF-DRIVING TECHNOLOGY SHOULD BE STANDARDIZED AND OPEN SOURCE.

Any other implementation puts profits over human lives.

[–] pezhore@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But on the other hand, if we don't do that, we can have a whole new level of industrial espionage where Hyundai targets Toyota vehicles to make them seem less safe and take over a wider market share.

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Won't somebody think of the shareholders?

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Whenever I think the world has gotten bleak, I remind myself that the Shareholders' value is being maximized to the exclusion of all other priorities. An American tear flows down my face as the stonk line goes up. Bless the shareholders.

/s if it wasn't obvious.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is actually funny. Imagine some automobile vendor misbehaving in some way and all other self-driving cars make a beeline for them just to ruin their crash statistics.

[–] elfin8er@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yea, no. That sounds terrible.

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds very Cyberpunk lol

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

How many out you would subscribe to an anti-tailgater feature though?

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] demesisx@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Trains are awesome and I fully support them but let's not be idealistic here and pretend that true self driving cars will never happen.

Edit: jokes on you! I made a grammatical correction that makes your reply IRRELEVANT. 😉

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They don't exist?

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We all know that the louder an opinion is expressed the more correct it is, so your opinion is very correct.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LETS DETONATE THE MOON SO THE TIDES DON'T RISE UP

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Heavy equipment also use the technology. Someone using this tool at a construction site could cause massive issue to 70k pound loaders using radar to detect personnel.

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Anyone read Attck Surface?