this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
69 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
491 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Carbon capture is a scam. We need to reduce carbon emissions. Capturing will never be an economical way of stopping climate catastrophe.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I suspect there will be a point where economics don't matter anymore and we don't have a choice.

[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but until we're a lot closer to zero carbon emissions than we are now, capture technology should be treated as research. Prototypes, even proof of scalability prototypes are fine, but they should not be sucking resources from emission reduction or, worse, trying to replace emission reduction.

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

100%! But the research is still vital, and we should be doing more of it while being way more aggressive about carbon reduction.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We are WAY past that point

[–] altasshet@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

I disagree only on a technicality - economics still matter for decision making, in the minds of people who are in power of making those decisions. Otherwise yeah, things are past the point of no return. Mitigation is all we can hope to do I think.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Nature already invented carbon capture, we call it trees.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Short term yes, but the long carbon cycle is where we should be looking because otherwise we’re an accident away from right back here

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Grassland and pasture captures more.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Hard to build a lasting house out of grass and that's the beauty of wood, you grow it, it captures carbon, you cut it to build a house and it's now stable for the foreseeable future.