this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

European Graphic Novels+

849 readers
28 users here now

“BD” refers to Franco-Belgian comics, but let's open things up to include ALL Euro comics and GN's. Euro-style work from around the world is also welcome!

* BD = "Bandes dessinées"
* BDT = Bedetheque
* GN = graphic novel
* LBK = Lambiek
* LC = "Ligne claire"

Please DO: 1) follow good 'netiquette' and 2) the four simple rules of lemm.ee (this instance) when posting and commenting. As for extracts, they're fine, but don't link to pirated downloads.

MODERATION: If you happen to make a mistake upon the above, then please don't worry about it. We'll likely just laugh it off and let you know. OTOH, obvious bad-faith and hostile efforts will not be tolerated here.

For posting tips, including how to handle NSFW and personal content, see the FAQ below.

The designated language here is English, with a traditional bias towards French. When posting foreign-language content, please DO include helpful context for English-speakers.

---> Here's the community F.A.Q, and our resource page <---

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

SEARCHES:
# #Tintin #Asterix #LuckyLuke #Spirou #Gaston #CortoMaltese #Thorgal #Sillage(Wake) #Smurfs #Trondheim #Moebius #Jodorowsky

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Die Abenteuer des Prinzen Achmed is a fairytale film by Lotte Reiniger. It is the oldest surviving animated feature film. The movie features a silhouette animation technique Reiniger invented that involved manipulated cutouts made from cardboard and thin sheets of lead, under a camera.

Here is what the thumbnail looks like animated.

The technique she used for the camera is similar to Wayang shadow puppets, though hers were animated frame by frame (at 24fps), not manipulated in live action. The original prints featured color tinting. Reiniger also used the first form of a multiplane camera in making the film, one of the most important devices in pre-digital animation. Work began in 1923, and the film was finished in 1926. --WP & Johnny

Here's a little trailer of short sequences:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_9L7r8NIBc

Having watched a bunch of early Fleischer, Disney and other cartoons, I was impressed by how unique this style is. While the movement is fairly simple (even crude at times), I found it refreshing how things moved independently of each other instead of being 'synced up and bouncing together' as with all those Disney & Fleischer shorts. Also, the silhouette animation style, while allowing very limited character detail, was somehow surprisingly modern in aesthetic IMO.

>>>HERE<<< is the whole 65 minute film, remastered in 4k and with a great, classical soundtrack. You'll get a much better taste of things than via the trailer, altho I don't blame you if you let it run in the background while you check your portable.

The story itself is based on elements from One Thousand and One Nights written by Hanna Diyab, including Aladdin, The Story of Prince Ahmed & the Fairy Perī-Bānū, and The Ebony Horse.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Heterocephalus@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Impressive! The technique seems inspired by traditional Wayang-Kulit theater from Indonesia / Java.

https://youtu.be/FJXxWfWHvBc?si=aIDb_81ILo6ShjUl

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Haha, was that a martial arts version of Punch & Judy, Aliens-style?

I've seen some Chinese versions, but that one was quite a bit different!

[–] Hemi03@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Greate visuals and effekts. All hand craftet

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

how long does one have to be for it to be classed as 'feature length'?

i certainly know of earlier animated films.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Good question!

There's a lot to unpack across these two links: [short films] and [feature films], but skimming through quickly, it seems like there's two main points:

  1. In terms of running length, it seems that the total number of 35mm reels (2-4 I think?) and total film length (35 - 40min it seems) tended to suggest a "short," while longer films could be said to be "feature-length."

  2. A completely different definition for "feature film" was based on it being the advertised lead film on the marquee. So I guess it's possible that a film could be both a short and a feature film at the same time(!) Note: in that era, no matter how long the feature-film ran, I believe it was typically accompanied by a short, including cartoons and newsreels.

Anyone feel free to take a deeper dive and correct any of that, please!

Btw-- what films were you thinking of...?

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

interesting, i guess it makes sense that the title of 'feature' truly is for the 'big picture' at the venue.

i was thinking of several early silent filmmakers, I'm sure none of which actually made an animated film any longer than 15-20 minutes.

specifically; otto mesmer, winsor mccay, emile reynaud, and emile cohl

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

otto mesmer, winsor mccay, emile reynaud, and emile cohl

Wait... you mean Franz Mesmer or Otto Messmer?
Those are some totally different people!

Anyway, I've seen some of the McCay stuff-- so genius!

(but who are Reynaud (literally "fox") and Cohl?)