this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
31 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

10138 readers
1144 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Britain after WWII there was a severe housing shortage and the solution they came up with was "row houses" basically large apartment blocks. The genius part of this was along with this you also got an allotment. A small parcel of land where you could garden and enjoy the outdoors.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Guns4Gnus@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, we had that here in Canada too, until the PCs and Libs killed it in the 1980s.

Before Mulroney pulled it, the CMHC would actively invest in housing start ups.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Back when the government arbitrarily decided that every public service must make positive income or be cut.

The 80s were fueled by cocaine and revenue.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Doesn't sound like the libs core m-o. Maybe, like this pipeline fiasco, they were convinced it would make the PCs their friends, and it failed as miserably then too?

[–] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cons under Mulroney began the cuts to social spending to balance the books, libs under Chretien finished it off.

The idea was that the government shouldn't have a hand in housing and it should be left to the free market.

[–] nicktron@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, the idea was that the federal government should keep their noses out of it and let the provinces handle it, much like healthcare.

[–] Guns4Gnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

And we've all seen since then that the provinces won't do a damn thing if they don't have a fire lit under their asses.

See: Carbon offset taxes.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

My grandparents had a council house in the UK, thankfully the allotmemt was just an extended back garden/yard. It was affordable housing for a family of 8.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Personally I think countless 3-5 storey steel-concrete multi-unit buildings are preferable from density, comfort (sound and heat insulation) and durability standpoint.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We need more of building for the middle, like the Barbican in the UK. https://youtu.be/FFDpqRxym_A?feature=shared

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/FFDpqRxym_A?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

We call them terraced houses, and just to clarify, they've been around for a lot longer than that.

I've got records of my family living in a terraced house in the 1881 census, and possibly earlier :)

[–] christopherius@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

There are a few in my city. Not sure how affordable they are though. I don't plan on buying a house