this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
162 points (96.0% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
510 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll disable the 2nd one for sure. 3rd one, too... 1st one stays enabled.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'd say only the ads are the issue, but the 'more options' button is kinda hidden. As if it's trying to lull you into accepting all. Also good choice to put it in the middle.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Connect none" is right there, though.

But I kinda glossed over it the first time I saw it.

Usually two opposing buttons will be next to each other, not be one on top of the other, won't they?

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes but the other two services are desirable, so I almost clicked accept all. Also the consent button feels like it has a more attractive text than the reject button.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That gray text right above the buttons suggests there there won't really be any negative impact, despite their desperate pleas right above it. I don't know, if this was me, I would definitely click Reject All and then see how messed up the resulting website ended up for me.

The psychological profiling that went into making equivalently styled Accept and Reject buttons look different to a reader is almost certainly intentional, though. Reminds me of the Redact app and how they would show you a crying kitten if you didn't share using their (previously free, now expensive) app on your Twitter profile.

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago

At the end of the gray sentence it says it impacts how tailored the service is. It's something that would be valuable to me in this case.

They should've shown a happy kitten instead.

[–] disgruntledbroad@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I gotta say as an American I really appreciate some of these recent things the EU is doing with privacy. They seem to have a bigger impact here than any actions American politicians come up with, which is depressing, but still deeply appreciated

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But still with dark pattens. Is that allowed?

[–] lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good question. AFAIK, it isn't in Germany, but many cimpanies don't care.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 8 months ago

I have filed a complaint with the gdpr representative in bavaria this month. Have you done your duty yet? :)

(I‘m joking of course but how awesome would it be if we (Fedi users) challenged each other to strike back like this every month? Like the ice bucket challenge but for privacy?)

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How so? Does "more options" have better options?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 8 months ago

All or nothing choices while "more options" is made easy to overlook on purpose.