this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
30 points (77.8% liked)

Programming

17378 readers
518 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 months ago (5 children)

The tech industry understands consent just fine, the corpos will ignore the idea however if it means less revenue and can't have that because capitalism.

I'm giving the benefit of the doubt to every one of these shitty clickbait article authors about "tech industry" and "software engineering circles" that the authors aren't dense and know random code monkeys aren't evil or too stupid to figure out opt-in is more ethical, they just work for corps that have to make money because capitalism, but they post their stupid garbage anyway because it gets clicks.

Don't post it here.

[–] porgamrer@programming.dev 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Why would you discourage interesting, original journalism over such an obtuse nitpick?

They are clearly criticising the same capitalist structures that you are. They single out the tech industry because the article is about the misuse of tech, not because they think rank and file tech workers are deviants.

Frankly it comes off as fragile and dismissive, and if that's what we're doing we could have just stayed on reddit.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

While the tone of the comment is dismissive, they have a point.

It's not the engineers that are the problem, or even limited to the tech industry. Dark patterns are top-down business decisions, motivated by money.

It's not that the "tech industry doesn't understand consent," but rather that greedy people do evil things. And software is just a low hanging fruit for that kind of business.

[–] porgamrer@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but what is the utility in taking the title so literally and ignoring the real content? It's a vague and mildly provocative title that is quickly clarified.

The article doesn't argue that the tech industry is uniquely evil. It is just spreading awareness about a specific phenomenon that is currently happening in the tech industry. That is what good journalism is. People can't organise a response to something they don't even know about.

Besides, the tech industry does have its own culture and that culture is full of problems. Capitalism is very top-down, but it's our shared culture that allowed tech solutionist billionaires to be embraced as heroes for so long. The least we can do is dispel the bad ideas they hide behind so people stop waiting for tech to save them.

And sorry if my tone seems rude. It's not intentional, it's just a frustrating subject to think about.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Software engineering has no culture - shared or otherwise. It's just a job, you clock in, you clock out, it's the same prison as anything else but with the comfort of WFH. The only maybe cultural aspect is that people refuse to unionize, but that's a different issue and a result of material pressures (far too much demand for jobs gives uneven bargaining power).

Bezos, musk, gates et al were never seen as heroes by those who don't idolize capitalists and corpos to begin with, and are still seen that way by the rest.

The future is indeed tech solutions and always has been, not an-prim nonsense and tech will indeed save us (and already has from every problem tackled thus far in humanity's history, every disease etc.), but those tech solutions have to be aligned with humanity's interests, and to do that you need to remove the exploitation incentive and the way you do that is by changing economic systems to communism or anarchism.

Idk I don't find it very frustrating, it's very clean cut in my opinion.

[–] porgamrer@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Software engineering has no culture - shared or otherwise.

This is absurd. Everything about software engineering is culture. It's built around shared cultural artifacts and texts. The idea of tech and a tech industry is a purely cultural delineation.

Bezos, musk, gates et al were never seen as heroes by those who don’t idolize capitalists and corpos to begin with, and are still seen that way by the rest.

Self-congratulating and utterly defeatist at the same time. Sorry but if you ever want a union it's pretty important that your colleagues don't think some CEO is the messiah. If you really haven't noticed a shift in the perception of tech billionaires in the last 10 years I don't know what to tell you.

The future is indeed tech solutions and always has been, not an-prim nonsense and tech will indeed save us

So you're a historical materialist who thinks we need a communist and/or anarchist revolution to save us, but who also thinks that we can sit around doing nothing until someone invents one in their garage? What on earth are you talking about?

the way you do that is by changing economic systems to communism or anarchism.

Okay but HOW? You seem to think an article that documents the exploitative behaviour of capitalists is somehow actively obstructing this revolution.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not the engineers that are the problem, or even limited to the tech industry. Dark patterns are top-down business decisions, motivated by money.

Just following orders, right?

Come on, that’s not how morality works.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you a moron? Because you sound like one. Are you really equating wageslaves working for Google instead of facilitating the sale of gazillions of far more unethical products at their local Walmart by being an associate customer success checkout wagie or smth to soldiers committing attrocities? Do you not even realize the "you hate prison, yet you participate in it - curious" levels of bullshit that view entails?

Because if you did that you'd be a moron. You are a moron.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Are you seriously suggesting knowledge workers have no responsibility for how their work is used?

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The corpos and gaffers ARE the tech industry. We all know that coders don't make decisions like that, and the article does not blame them. I'm all for raising awareness of the problems with "opt-out" and fluid license agreements.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The article says "software engineering circles" so yes it does mean coders absolutely and primarily.

[–] phonyphanty@pawb.social 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nowhere in the article does the author pin blame on individual employees. "Tech industry" obviously refers to corporations, not individual contributors. The title isn't clickbait.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Tech industry" does not mean that, it could just as well mean "people in the tech industry" which means "people who work in the tech industry". The author uses this because it's the boogeyman du jour with Sam altman and such but his entire essay is dancing around the point that it's capitalism and has nothing to do with tech or is even specific to it. They would've probably had more of an article if they tried to specifically tie it to Nestle than the Tech Industry but it wouldn't get them those precious clicks.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

This also isn't only the tech industry, it's any industry. Pushy door to door salespeople aren't in the tech industry.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

I try to fight some battles about ads, accessibility and an open web but I’m a failing don Chiosciotte; best I can actively do is test mainly for Firefox and make sure everything works properly there but for more business related decisions (see: ads, consent etc) there is little to nothing I can do

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You are out of your mind. Soatok has more credibility in the industry than all the posters here put together.

You might not want to read it. Skip it and move on.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you this 'soatok'? I've never heard of you before doesn't look like anyone else has either.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Umm no? Soatok is Soatok.

He’s an expert in the field of the security of cryptographic implementations, along with other lesser interests.

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!

Upton Sinclair

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Hey, non-FOSS internet, how is it going?

...

Yeah.