this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
99 points (90.9% liked)

Fediverse

17535 readers
55 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello everyone,

Opening this thread as a kind of follow-up on my thread yesterday about the drop in monthly active users on !fediverse@lemmy.ml.

As I pointed in the thread, I personally think that having some consolidated core communities would be a better solution for content discovery, information being posted only once, and overall community activity.

One of the examples of the issue of having two (or more) exactly similar Fediverse communities (!fediverse@lemmy.world and !fediverse@lemmy.ml ) is that is leads to

  • people having to subscribe to both to see the content
  • posters having to crosspost to both
  • comment being spread across the crossposts instead of having all of the discussion and reactions happening in the same place.

I am very well aware of the decentralized aspect of Lemmy being one of its core features, but it seems that it can be detrimental when the co-existing communities are exactly the same.

We are talking about different news seen from the US or Europe, or a piece of news discussed in places with different political orientations.

The two Fediverse communities look identical, there is no specific editorial line. The difference in the audience is due to the federation decisions of the instances, but that's pretty much it, and as the topic of the community is the Fediverse itself, the community should probably be the one accessible from most of the Fediverse users.

What do you think?

Also, as a reminder, please be respectful in the comments, it's either one of the rules of the community or the instance. Disagreeing is fine, but no need to be disrespectful.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think Lemmy.world should not have 99.999% of communities.

We can have one fediverse community but it should not be on Lemmy.world. It's already extreamly centralized with almost all users. It should have all communities as well?

I feel the same about every other duplicate community. Because i actually care about having a decentralized fediverse.

[–] Lucia@eviltoast.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

.ml also has a lot of active communities though. While I agree .ml is better than .world, feeding any one of these won't be good for decentralization anyway.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

Completely agree.

Pushing for https://lemmy.film/, literature.cafe/, https://mander.xyz/ etc. as much as I can, but the established communities usually have the natural inertia working for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Lemmy neads a feature where people can "merge" communities from different instances so it appears like a single one.

[–] Lucia@eviltoast.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How will they merge moderation then? Every instance has their own set of rules. If it's done automatically, it will cause a lot of trouble in a long run.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't have to, it would just be on the user end.

Like on reddit you could do multi-reddits, for example I could type in r/anime_titties+worldnews+news and I would get posts from all 3 communities in a single feed.

[–] Lucia@eviltoast.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, got ya! That's a neat feature, for sure. But it doesn't fix this concern:

comment being spread across the crossposts instead of having all of the discussion and reactions happening in the same place.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lucia@eviltoast.org 20 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Deciding on a single community to rule them all is a bit hard because of defederation - shall we choose .world and we basically remove beehaw users from discussion, and .ml also has their defederation list. Communities like c/fediverse and c/lemmy must be available to everyone IMO.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Rottcodd@lemmy.ninja 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't matter what you, I or (almost) anyone else thinks about much of anything here.

You say that you're "well aware of the decentralized aspect of Lemmy," but apparently you really haven't thought it through.

The simple fact of the matter is that there is no mechanism by which any self-appointed "we" can do anything.

The instance owners are entirely free to run their instances as they prefer, and the community owners are entirely free to run their communities as they prefer, and that really is that.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think this is just another variant of FOMO. You don't need to and will never be able to read every fediverse discussion taking place on Lemmy. So just relax, subscribe to what ever community feels more home to you personally and that's it 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm subscribed to four communities named "fediverse@"something. Yes, it's a bit annoying. But it's also good to have backups, in the sense that I never know which instance might defederate from my own or from others who also use these communities.

Not sure what the point of this post is. Do you want people to vote on which to keep, and which to discard? They already do that. People subscribe and unsubscribe, post or don't, as they please. Apparently, we continuously vote on having four (probably even more) redundant communities.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure what the point of this post is.

I was trying to address a point that is frequently raised by people that gave Lemmy a try but are not planning to stay: seeing the same content posted across a few similar communities hinders content discovery, and just provides a worse browsing experience than centralized solutions like Reddit.

This seems to be an issue we should probably discuss, as it may prevent growth of the platform if most of the new joiners face it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The way i handle this is to sub to the biggest community on a given topic i can find. The exception to this is if i find a smaller community that is more active.

[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just sub to them all, there's no limit like on reddit.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 5 points 1 year ago

The dups annoy me, otherwise i would.

[–] Jomn@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like it's more of a client issue than a Lemmy issue. We could imagine having clients that correctly support crossposting by having tabs for each comment section.

[–] whiskers@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

Or alternatively, all the comments across them should be visible in-line in all communities.

Either of these approaches gives the agency to users to only reply to one of the cross post and read all the opinions/thoughts on that post. At the same time, it maintains the federation philosophy by not taking a community about a topic down, if the instance fails.

[–] Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

comment being spread across the crossposts instead of having all of the discussion and reactions happening in the same place.

I find this to be more positive than negative. The tone of the entire comment section tends to be set by the first few comments meaning every post has a high risk of becoming it's own tiny echo chamber. Spreading comments across multiple communities makes it more likely that the discussion will explore different aspects of the topic and that different opinions on the topic will be explored.

[–] Lucia@eviltoast.org 5 points 1 year ago

Also discussions on different instances may have different flavors: e.g., many .world users prefer to participate in local communities, while .ml is federated with beehaw and hexbear, so it's kinda have a wider reach within threadiverse. Communities on smaller instances may be predominately populated by users of said instance.

[–] amio@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think you need to post twice? This is what happens.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ml have their own defederation lists, meaning that to reach everyone, you need to post twice.

That's actually part of the issue I was detailing in my post.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think this matters. If they are defederated from an instance you post in, then they determined that they don't want to see what gets posted there. Why is it so important to reach everyone?

(To be fair, I think you should be able to post the same thing 10 times if you really want to, I just wish the site I use had a feature that would just automatically pool all posts with identical headings or links into a single post, then treat it like a mini community/magazine.)

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I think the issue I have is that I feel that in the last few days, the content seems more stale.

That’s why I had a look at active users and noted that we were fewer.

One potential way to address this would be to have one community to be the announcement one to the rest of the Fediverse.

Today, it feels like getting information to people is a hassle. They arrive on the platform, they subscribe to the top communities, and then what? How are they supposed to learn about LASIM, that if they move to a smaller instance for better performance they might have to ask their admin to run LCS to get a populated All feed, that they can have a look at !trendingcommunities@feddit.nl for rising communities?

We probably lack a reference website to answer all of these questions. But even then, due to how fast the platform evolves, we would still need a way to communicate new tools or features to most of the users.

[–] minnix@lemux.minnix.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are advocating for a single point of failure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] th_in_gs@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It seems almost all commenters here are agreeing with the premise that ‘posters [have] to crosspost to both’.

I don’t think this is true. It leads to people subscribed to both having two identical posts with different responses in their feed, which is annoying. Just post to the one that you’re ‘closest’ to, or pick one at random.

Part of beauty of federation is that you can see all the content from multiple places. Cross-posting is not required!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

With all the defederation going on nowadays I'm happy that there are many different servers hosting the same content, otherwise people couldn't participate in the discourse once the one and only server which hosts the community defederates from their server.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I envision what you're asking as kinda like IRC. Everyone on the same network (Lemmy) can join the same channel (community) and would be some sort of sync feature for when defederation/instance vanishes (netsplit) happens to re-sync everyone. This would require some sort of trust cert/key or something from each community that wanted to join the conjoined version, as well as to validate they are still the correct community and not a bad actor.

Not sure how moderation and communities that wanted to leave the whole would be handled though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›