On top of that they had to dumb down the graphics to make it run on console.
Games
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
And it occasionally ran at 24 fps, which I think is a phenomenal feat!
if they released it today i would still be impressed by the graphics
This from 360 gen and Arkham Knight from Xbox One/PS4 still look incredible.
Been replaying Arkham Knight lately. Yes it does still look amazing. The environmental destruction is pretty amazing as well.
We're rapidly approaching a time when 20 year old games will still look pretty good by today's standards. Really shows how much graphics have slowed down - used to be that 5 year old games looked hopelessly outdated.
When Doom was 5 years old we got Half-Life. When GTA2 was 5 years old we got GTA San Andreas. When Quake was 5 years old we got Halo. Pretty crazy.
It says a lot we've moved towards full PBR and raytracing, and it barely looks as impressive as Crysis did.