this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
91 points (97.9% liked)

Star Trek

10613 readers
11 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

'...to build that optimistic future that is Roddenberry’s essential vision?' That is very much going to be at the heart of Starfleet Academy.

I certainly hope so. Star Trek should be optimistic. The Federation is a utopia. We don't need grungy pessimism. Every other sci-fi is already doing that.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 months ago

I don't totally disagree, but I don't agree either. Star Trek touches on a lot of issues of today, just from a futuristic perspective. It uses aliens to talk about race, for example. It doesn't ignore race issues because their society isn't racist anymore. It just recontextualizes it so people of today will see it and internalize it, but they won't be offended by it.

The thing that makes great sci-fi is using their lense to examine real topics of today. If it doesn't do this then it can only be mediocre at best.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you recall, there was all this noise around Season 1 and Season 2 of Discovery because the streaming service, they were like, 'Oh, it’s like a turnaround on a cop show.' I’m like, 'No, you don’t understand. It’s eight months of visual effects turnaround, and we’re not gonna rush that.'

I most certainly do not recall that, and it says a lot about the people running CBS All Access at the time.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

Idk, "It's like a turnaround cop show" kind of sounds a lot like "Screw you I don't want to pay for another streaming service". Perhaps he just misheard absolutely everyone.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I will wait until the reviews roll in. Not really interested in more Discovery-era content. Still waiting for a maroon uniform era show.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago

You know if that happened the internet fans would complain about another prequel.

Not that I agree with them, I would love to see it.

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I haven't watched Discovery past episode 6 or 7 of season 1 (after the klingon sex scene, I tapped out) . I take it they're 1000 years in the future now, and that's when this series takes place?

If so, oof, it will be hard to identify with a millenium of progress, unless they pull a Futurama and have everything rebuilt a few hundred years in (after the second coming of Jesus of course). Why not go back to the Harve Bennett-era academy series for inspiration? Or set it after Nemesis?

The only redeeming grace for me so far is having Tawny Newsome (or is it Trondy Newman?) in the writers room. She is an absolute delight

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I assume you don't care about spoilers, but just in case...

Discovery season three spoilersThere have indeed been some significant setbacks over the centuries.

First there were the temporal wars, the full ramifications of which have not been fully explored, but were likely pretty devastating.

These were followed by the one-two punch of a dilithium supply crisis, followed by "The Burn," which caused most of the existing dilithium supplies to go inert and/or explode. This had the effect of making interstellar travel extremely challenging, and many planets became isolationist in the name of protecting themselves.

These issues have all been resolved, but they had a large impact on the development of...everyone, really.

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Interesting, thanks!

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Discovery is meh but I watch it just to finish it off. I love SNW like everyone of course.

I'll give this a chance, since I was not into the idea of the show Gen V until it came out and kicked ass.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait. Gen V got good? I noped when it was consistently Orange County in depth and MTV's Real World in manufactured edge. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

It's consistent with the boys, if you like the boys you'd do well to finish the series as shit gets real, and this show is clearly going to connect with the boys season that's coming up

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think it's relevant to make more 32st century content.

And, isn't Star Trek: Legacy already supposed to be the "next next generation" sequel?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"Legacy" is an imaginary show. It's never been put into development, and there's no indication that will change.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Please. They don't tease a new show by accident, or on the hopes alone. They also don't increment the Enterprise letter without some solid buy-in from the network. Legacy is happening.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Literally no one but Terry Matalas has "teased" anything, and he's been very open about the fact that there's no movement whatsoever on it becoming a reality.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Where's 32nd St?