this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
99 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
4106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Am I too pessimistic about this? Today it can detect ransomware, the next day could be malware, and the day after can be any file.

It's just a data filter that's build in to a hardware and possibly no way to trun off. Last thing I want is a black box watching what I stored on my drive.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

False positives everywhere

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just to play devil's advocate here: if that system can scan better than current systems, it's already a win. If that system can scan more efficiently than current systems, even with false positives, that could be a win, if used as a screening layer.

There could be use cases for this, or it's just buzzwords and marketing.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This doesn't sound any different than what most host based AV already do. The novel idea is implementing it in on the storage array directly in a way that doesn't hose performance. That means instead of needing 100% coverage of all clients to detect/ prevent ransomware encrypting your network storage, the storage array can detect it and presumably reject the compromised client.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

No change then. Every time I've uploaded new encrypted (most) data to one drive, it's emailed me about potential ransomware.

[–] halva@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

buzzword, buzzword, buzzword

[–] InfCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Marketing will love this

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

Color me skeptical on this one. Quarantining files isn't a case where I want AI's tendency to make shit up when confused.

[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I can identify a lot of things in a minute.

Doesn’t mean I’m not a bullshitter.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

IBM is coasting on name recognition.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

I only want open source file scanning, otherwise it is certainly also scanning for pirated files, illegal files, etc, and reporting them to the government without my consent.

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah a bit. IBM QRadar is alright. I’m confident there’s something real (and real expensive) underneath the buzzword salad in that article.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

IBM Watson AI

Warning, User. Ransomware has been detected!

Choose corrective action: Delete data or pay the scammer?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Delete, pay scammer, or pay us. We offer you 10% off what the scammer is charging if you sign up for our monthly anti scammer subscription.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 0 points 8 months ago

Who apart from legacy banks buys IBM? LOL 🤣